• Brewchin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    [citation needed]

    Gonna need more than a confident declaration to convince people potentially impacted by this. Provide it… or shut up.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        I just did. To allow screen readers which is what AI would do if this became a common block it uses this:

        " Pressing it sets the reader’s browser to solving a compute-heavy puzzle: JavaScript and a few seconds of processing, more than most mass scrapers are willing to spend."

        Which is exactly the method already addressed in the article: " requiring computationally expensive systems to access the content"

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I just tried the demo.

        • Visually… it just functions like a copy blocker, which news sites have tried forever to fight plagarism.

        • The original text is still in the website’s source, in plain text.

        …I don’t even understand what its supposed to accomplish. Just make copy-paste more difficult for humans, or agents looking at the page visually? The raw page source is the thing that’s scraped, AFAIK.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I’m looking their demo website https://shieldfont.org/demo/

        It’s 100% scrappable. Nothing there stops me for scrapping the true text. It’s a very minor inconvenience at most. I would even argue that’s more of a pain for users and developers than for scrappers.

      • Brewchin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        OK cool, thanks. What I saw in demos a week or so ago seemed “fuck those screen reader folks”. Would be good if it’s not as bad as that.