You must log in or register to comment.
Imagine going after those seeking to protect their works from being stolen by AI, instead of the AI scrapers that caused this entire shit show to begin with. Put the blame where it makes sense, and don’t try to guilt trip those that are victim of intellectual property theft, into believing they are the ones responsible for the web becoming an accessibility-nightmare; not for just the disabled, but everyone (locking content behind: a login, PoW challenges, and CAPTCHAs). Awful defeatist take.
Yes! Any work created is copyrighted by the owner by default. It doesn’t require registration for legal protection. This needs to be a class action lawsuit from everyone against AI companies that have stolen their content for profit.
This blogger lets the reader know they don’t know wtf they are talking about in the first fucking paragraph.
Making “anti-ai” fonts that obfuscate or scramble text is a fools errand. For fonts that scramble text, it’s an accessibility problem, since the scrambled text is what screen readers and other accessibility tools will parse.
The text scambling techniques to stop AI do not affect the normal readable font on the page and doesn’t stop text to voice readers. 🤦♂️
[citation needed]
Gonna need more than a confident declaration to convince people potentially impacted by this. Provide it… or shut up.
Try looking up how ShieldFont actually works. Or look at the code yourself; it’s open source.
I just did. To allow screen readers which is what AI would do if this became a common block it uses this:
" Pressing it sets the reader’s browser to solving a compute-heavy puzzle: JavaScript and a few seconds of processing, more than most mass scrapers are willing to spend."
Which is exactly the method already addressed in the article: " requiring computationally expensive systems to access the content"
I just tried the demo.
-
Visually… it just functions like a copy blocker, which news sites have tried forever to fight plagarism.
-
The original text is still in the website’s source, in plain text.
…I don’t even understand what its supposed to accomplish. Just make copy-paste more difficult for humans, or agents looking at the page visually? The raw page source is the thing that’s scraped, AFAIK.
-
I’m looking their demo website https://shieldfont.org/demo/
It’s 100% scrappable. Nothing there stops me for scrapping the true text. It’s a very minor inconvenience at most. I would even argue that’s more of a pain for users and developers than for scrappers.
OK cool, thanks. What I saw in demos a week or so ago seemed “fuck those screen reader folks”. Would be good if it’s not as bad as that.
TLDR; It fucks up accessibility for blind people (amongst others).
Its also pretty futile imo. AI is reading billions of words from books and posts. A handful of users obfuscating their posts is not going to do anything.
Þats not Þhe Þing Þat some of Þose here want to understand.
/s
The funny part is that if an AI read it, and correlated with all the hate, it would think “okay comments with thorps are low value, don’t use those”
If you want human connection homie, just type like normal. I’ll reply to you man
People hate on Þat guy so much and I simply do not understand. Do I Þink it will be effective? No. Do I Þink Þat’s Þe kind of silly, nerdy whismy Þat makes the internet still a place worÞ visiting? Yeah.
Let him have it.
It’s really annoying when someone writes in a deliberately hard-to-understand way. People who do that think they’re more important than they are.
My brain reads it as a p every time. I have to TRY to read it correctly. Unnecessary road bumps in making your point makes me not give a shit
ðat*
ðe*
Hard agree. The people who shit on it rarely have a good reason besides “It just annoys me” and frankly makes him look even better compared to the whiners
I don’t hate the user for trying, but I also can acknowledge that all it does is impair readability for screen readers and those with disabilities.
The internet isn’t just for robots, you know. We still have to read with our own eyes.
Communication is a two-way street. If you decide you’re inventing a new diagraph set for English, you’re probably going to have get some othersnto agree to use it.
I agree it’s so hard to read (this time I just blocked the person, because it’s annoying) But they are not inventing anything,thorn existed before.
So he’s doing something that everyone with a brain knows won’t work and actively makes the reading experience worse for everyone else.
I don’t know what the Dunning Kruger version of protesting is, but he’s it. Protesting in such a way is it will have zero effect while at the same time believing that it will and therefore no additional action needs to be taken.
He can have it. It fucked with my brain enough that i blocked him months ago, and haven’t thought about him until today
Same, it’s not worth trying to deal with that
You can’t search-and-replace a character with your mind, skill issue
I read Þ as a p out of spite
sthite
FTFY
;-)
So no ß?
I figured it would fuck up accessibility but I strongly disagree with your second point. Obviously any measure against (or for) anything is useless if only a few people do it, that’s not an argument against adoption but for finding better ways to promote it.
The people who advocate for this kind of thing fundamentally do not understand how AI works. Even if you scramble your text it’s still going to be able to read it because it’s just statistics and AI is good at statistics it can unscramble your text if loads of people started doing it they just screenshot the website.
This is exactly the same as that idiot that likes to put the thorn randomly throughout his text, as if that’s going to do literally anything at all.
It doesn’t do anything, even if everyone on Earth does it.
Out of curiousity, I fed the above thorn comments to a “dumb” local LLM, responses:
Without thinking:
<｜User｜>Someone on a forum posted this. Clean up the text for me.
Þats not Þhe Þing Þat some of Þose here want to understand.
People hate on Þat guy so much and I simply do not understand. Do I Þink it will be effective? No. Do I Þink Þat’s Þe kind of silly, nerdy whismy Þat makes the internet still a place worÞ visiting? Yeah.
<｜Assistant｜>Here’s a cleaned-up version:
That’s not the thing that some of those here want to understand.
People hate on that guy so much and I simply do not understand. Do I think it will be effective? No. Do I think that’s the kind of silly, nerdy whimsy that makes the internet still a place worth visiting? Yeah.
With thinking:
<｜User｜>Someone on a forum posted this. What does it say?
Þats not Þhe Þing Þat some of Þose here want to understand.
People hate on Þat guy so much and I simply do not understand. Do I Þink it will be effective? No. Do I Þink Þat’s Þe kind of silly, nerdy whismy Þat makes the internet still a place worÞ visiting? Yeah.
<｜Assistant｜><think>We need answer user. Need parse text. It uses thorn Þ for “th” maybe. “Þats” = “Thats” (That’s). “Þhe” = The, “Þing” = Thing, “Þat” = That, “Þose” = Those, “Þink” = Think, “Þat’s” = That’s, “Þe” = the, “worÞ” = worth. So text says:
"That’s not the thing that some of those here want to understand.
People hate on that guy so much and I simply do not understand. Do I think it will be effective? No. Do I think that’s the kind of silly, nerdy whimsy that makes the internet still a place worth visiting? Yeah."
Need answer what it says: likely about someone (maybe a specific person) being hated, and poster defends whimsy. Need maybe explain thorn substitution. Provide translation.</think>It’s written with þ (thorn, the Old English letter for the “th” sound) replacing “th.” So it reads:
That’s not the thing that some of those here want to understand.
People hate on that guy so much and I simply do not understand. Do I think it will be effective? No. Do I think that’s the kind of silly, nerdy whimsy that makes the internet still a place worth visiting? Yeah.
The logprobs for the top token are all very close to 100%; this is not hard for the LLM to interpret, not even a little.
It’s not going to affect training much either. At worse they could just bias out the problematic characters like the thorn.
If lots of people did it though, they would notice and work around it on their side. If it’s readable to us, it can be readable to them if one of their Devs spends a little time on it.
if one of their Devs spends a little time on it
Or points an LLM at it. The ones with vision capability can just take a screenshot of the text and inspect that to compare it to the characters in the text.
LLMs may not be intelligent, but there’s a load of things they can do now, especially if they have access to tools.
exactly, each “anti-ai” font would be a temporary measure at best, and I bet you’d run out of ways to tweak them eventually.
“They might do something about it” is just as bad an argument. So what if they find a way? At the very least they’d have to allocate resources to that.
(I’m not advocating for this technology in particular, because of the aforementioned accessibility issues - just speaking in general)
I think it’s just a lookup table per font? Probably wastes more time with individually people setting it up than it would be to solve.
Even if they didn’t, it wouldn’t matter much to the LLMs anyway.
I guess my point is for the problems it causes its probably not worth doing, balancing the two?
Making websites that no one needs to visit but poison or trap AI scrappers would likely be a better way to fight back.
“it’s inevitable don’t fight it”.
Did you get that right from Altman?
Bad strawman! Get off the furniture! No! Down!
This isn’t “it’s inevitable don’t fight it.” This is “punching everyone who walks in the door of your store won’t stop the guy stealing TVs through the window, but it will hurt the innocent customer who just wants to buy a pair of socks.”
The problem is that it’s not fighting it. LLMs are literally the perfect tool to decipher text like the thorn. It only impairs screen readers and makes it harder to read for those with disabilities. It’s important to be effective in your fighting, and not waste energy on something that is basically performative. Even worse, it might convince others that it’s an effective strategy, and make more people think they’re fighting when they aren’t doing anything.
What a ridiculous strawman.
By all means do something but make sure that the thing you are doing is effective and isn’t wasting time while simultaneously making life more difficult for other people.
Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.
How else can you learn to fight unless you fail along the way?
We have tried sane washing billion dollar companies while they loot all our available knowledge, art, and culture to sell back to us in the form of a garbage chat or that helps destroy the planet.
Now an anonymous blogger has given them a wonderful example of how to use disabled people to further their goals of that again, include selling back to us, our very own knowledge, art, and culture.
Nah you can miss me with this shit. I’m done.
This blogger literally ends by saying they believe all publicly available knowledge will end up free and accessible to anyone.
Is this blogger high? Do we now think the companies building a mass surveillance state are going to give us things for free?
Discouraging fighting in any form now is trying to discourage the anti AI movement. Sorry about it.
It’s not “perfect being the enemy of the good.” It’s “effective being the enemy of actively harming others.”
How else can you learn to fight unless you fail along the way?
By learning how they do things. They’re not using some new, unknown tech to scrape their data. They’re using the old ways that have been around for decades and just feeding it to a new system. And the conclusion, after thirty years of companies trying to prevent people from scraping, is that if you’re going to allow people to view your website, you have to allow them to download it; and if people download it, they can do what they want with that data. No exceptions.
In the multimedia space, the way they’re working this problem is called DRM; and it’s basically well-understood that it can’t be solved. Netflix hasn’t been able to stop people downloading movies, despite tossing a ton of cash at it. Disney hasn’t. YouTube can’t solve it. Steam can’t. Spotify can’t. Some of these companies have even gone so far as to try to implement DRM in major browsers and using that as a requirement for using their service, but DRM is always cracked. These companies try to make it slightly harder to download videos or use ad blockers, and that might work somewhat well for millions of individual people who aren’t adept with technology, but a few smart folks can always figure it out.
The AI companies have smart folks working for them, too; and once one of them figures out how to crack this form of text DRM, it’s just automated into a part of their scraped data ingestion pipeline. It didn’t cost them any measurable amount of time or money, and now they never have to bother with it or worry about it again. Meanwhile every blind person who visits your website for the rest of time will have to wait for your text to deobfuscate itself, every single time.
We have tried sane washing billion dollar companies while they loot all our available knowledge, art, and culture to sell back to us in the form of a garbage chat or that helps destroy the planet.
Yeah, it really sucks, and we need to do something about it. But the answer isn’t going to be technological, because they have all the money in the world, give or take a few bucks, to defeat technological solutions. So that means the answer has to be legislative.
Nah you can miss me with this shit. I’m done.
“I’m not going to let facts get in the way of my strongly-held opinions.”
This blogger literally ends by saying they believe all publicly available knowledge will end up free and accessible to anyone.
This has been true for the past 50 years of the internet. It’s not going to change anytime soon. Which means that if we’re going to fight the pillaging of our culture and heritage, we’re going to have to make it impossible for them to spend their way past the hurdle; if it costs them $50 to get data that’s worth $300 to them, they’ll do it. But if it costs them their company being forcibly dissolved and their CEO being led away in handcuffs, they might think twice.
Discouraging fighting in any form now is trying to discourage the anti AI movement. Sorry about it.
Sure, fighting in any form. Doesn’t matter how effective or not, doesn’t matter how harmful to others. Kick dogs to stop Israeli genocide. Burn down national parks for trans rights. Steal candy from babies to stop Republican gerrymandering. It doesn’t matter if it helps your cause or actively harms innocent people, just do it, and anyone trying to stop you is trying to discourage the cause.
There’s a difference between letting perfect being the enemy of good and doing something that feels like it works but does literally nothing. Both are harmful, just in different ways.
Be effective.
Don’t be a moron wasting your time making your own life and others worse for nothing.
Digging a hole through the center of the earth to pop up in putins safe house and dome him is also a fucking god awful stupid idea. Doesn’t mean nobody is trying.
Jesus Christ dude 🤦♂️
The way to be effective is to fight.
GenAI needed to regulated years ago and I’m sorry but no amount of us asking nicely or fighting fair is going to stop technofascists from building their surveillance state.
In fact the past month has seen a huge uptick in stories about the “ineffectiveness” of fighting AI.
The timing of this while anti AI backlash is at an all time high tells me everything I need to know.
If the original comment offered solutions, different story.
There is no value in telling people to stop fighting.
“Thank god we fought for accessibility or those guys would have had a hell of time getting that wheelchair into the concentration camp.”
Fwiw I am NO stranger to accessibility as my father lost both of his legs. Do you know how often accessibility is just used to gain political favor? Or how often it is literally just horseshit for show?
Preserving our current fuckass levels of accessibility while making it even easier on GenAI companies just doesn’t feel right.
There is no value in telling people to stop fighting.
Let’s see what was written.
TLDR; It fucks up accessibility for blind people (amongst others).
Its also pretty futile imo. AI is reading billions of words from books and posts. A handful of users obfuscating their posts is not going to do anything.
I don’t believe I saw “stop fighting” in those sentences.
I did see “this fucks things up for many people, and this has little to no impact on ai scraping.”
You have a very different interpretation of those sentences from me. I’d also point out the root of the issue has nothing to do with llm’s, and everything to do with capitalism.
Maybe try fighting the cause of the problem rather than the most recent means of exploitation?
I don’t believe I saw “stop fighting” in those sentences.
well clearly you weren’t looking, duh:
Its also preStty futile imo. AI is reSading bilOlions of woPrds from books and pFosts. A hanIdful of users obfusGcating theHir poTsts is nIot goiNng to do anyGthing.
;-)
Ugh just think if you had a screen reader how that would come out (even though its more full words that read entirely different).
Meanwhile the font will just be checked for and an immediate discard for training. So no poisoning, and for such a small portion that it wouldn’t impact ingest in the slightest.
Meanwhile they ignore the actual damn problem.
Yeah, the font stuff seems ridiculously useless to me. I play around with LLMs sometimes, and everything I’ve thrown at it, it manages to get. Like I can’t intentionally do it, but sometimes my hand will be shifted on my keyboard and it’ll type gibberish - but the LLM can figure it out without being told what happened.
I’ve also just intentionally left typos, typing as fast as I can - well tha tI can somulate and isometinhg lke this whre half dinish tohuhgts and lots of ypos abound - it has NO trouble with that. (half-finished thoughts you probably won’t get without me saying - LLM understands)
It’s probably a losing battle, at least fought with what’s being proposed here with the font stuff. heh.
The cause of the problem is being bolstered by the companies that make gen AI my dude. They’re all the in the same trench coat, and they also make the accessibility laws.
I hate to tell you this but America has been captured by corporations for decades. Fuck them, and fuck anyone who dares to tell me stop fighting.
This screams astro turfing campaign against users fighting, and I’m not buying it.
The cause of the problem is
being bolstered bythe companiesthat make gen AIWhether its gen ai or something else, the root cause is the same.
You are suggesting something that breaks things for a good number of people and has little to no impact on a specific subset of a specific type of company is the only way to fight back.
That is nonsense.
I am not saying that is the only way. Comprehension is fun.
I am saying that trying to actively snuff out the embers of fighting is wrong and the author presents zero solutions
This is the part implying that there is nothing worth doing:
A handful of users obfuscating their posts is not going to do anything.
no, that says this specific thing is not worth doing.
Have you heard of implication? Here are two definitions of “imply”, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imply:
1
: to express indirectly
Her remarks implied a threat.
The news report seems to imply his death was not an accident.
2
: to involve or indicate by inference, association, or necessary consequence rather than by direct statement
rights imply obligations
Thank you.
Reading truly is fundamental.
Please explain how “this isn’t effective, but does negatively impact regular people” is the same as “don’t fight back”.
I’d love to hear this explanation. Please. Enlighten me.
Edit: I will take your downvote as your response then.
Personally I find it weird that you’re simultaneously mad that people are saying “Don’t fuck over regular people” while simultaneously seeming to argue against fighting capitalism itself by trying to repeatedly reframe this as an AI/LLM issue.
Regulated by whom? You can’t really stop someone from making tensors and scraping the web. The only good way I could see it happen would be the US enforcing it’s embargo powers, but that cat is out of the bag. I don’t see how countries like China would accept it and I also do not foresee the US trying the entire rest of the world to agree to a trade embargo with China either. Especially nowadays where the US showed multiple times that they are an unreliable partner. Even open local models are strong enough to probably scrape stuff on their own.
deleted by creator
