• cannedtuna@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Ran into this shit yesterday trying to set up a laptop for someone where I had no internet access.

    Imagine having everything ready to go on a USB drive and you can’t get past the second screen unless you find WiFi.

    At least this command still works, but damn.

    • TerHu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 hours ago

      windows didn’t have the drivers for my mobo, so i could use neither ethernet nor wifi.

      imagine having to have a usb to ethernet dongle ready to set up windows.

      what a fucking shitshow…

    • toor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Video games have gone this way too. Pop in disc or cartridge, go to play, forced to download updates that fix what was shipped in a broken state.

      • iamthetot@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        For the record, the majority of games ship on disc. If you had auto updates off or no internet, the game will play after installing.

      • hakase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And then they have the gall to point to sales of physical media being down.

        Like, if you make your physical media shit on purpose, you can’t use that to support your argument for digital-only distrubition. It’s actually infuriating.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If you use Rufus you can create the USB that automatically bypasses the Internet requirements. Still annoying af though.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You can’t be serious, or you must not support Windows much.

        I don’t think much of my workplace’s Windows desktop “engineer” but even they’ve put together (and keep updated) an image that can get from blank drive to fully installed, updated, baseline programs for our company installed, all settings tweaked to get rid of 90% of the dumb Windows bloat (have to leave the shit the execs like in place) in 30 minutes unattended.

        The server builds my team oversees are 10 minutes setups, if that.

        Like, I’ve been desktop support, and installing and configuring the department specific programs could be such annoying shit that you’d end up saving more time reimaging when something fucked up than to try and fix it, but the initial OS install was rarely the issue. Maybe for the first few days with entirely new hardware while we figured out the right drivers, but that was it.


        Linux is leagues better than Windows, but some of this shit I keep seeing in these Linux communities is batshit. You personally not being familiar with Windows isn’t a reason it sucks, any more than people saying Linux is complicated is a reason for them to hate Linux.

        • BL4CKP1XX13@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I am not unfamiliar with Windows in any sense thank you. Windows is objectively bad, there is no good reason that one must maintain their own custom image to install an operating system to a usable capacity because the vendor image is so disgustingly bloated that getting any real-world use is a chore.

          And it’s not even recent Windows enshittification that is the problem, it is the foundational architecture of the NT system. With a Linux operating system, you install, and you’re done, on Windows, you install, then you need to go out and do 15+ updates that for some reason aren’t done during install, then you need to go out and get all your drivers for your hardware. It’s poorly designed, slow, clunky, and, especially considering that Windows doesn’t have a package manager and a curated software repository (Winget + MS Store does NOT count), unbelievably insecure.

          My organization has pretty much decided that Windows is on the way out, it’s just going to be a very long time for us to transfer to Linux-based operating systems. Even after getting Windows to a just-about acceptable standard, it’s still far heavier than any Linux-based OS would be, which for our thin clients is genuinely proving a problem as many of our staff have high memory usage workflows and are frequently seeing programs crash due to memory limitations.

          Unless you are severely, clinically deluded, there is no way you can genuinely state that what you hear in Linux communities is “batshit”; everyone knows Windows is dying, even Microsoft…

      • DarkSirrush@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Every time i see a comment about NixOS it makes me even more wary about trying it.

        Everyone jokes about Arch being the ‘from the ground up’ OS, but Nix feels like it embodies those memes.

        • urushitan 漆たん@kakera.kintsugi.moe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Yeah nixos is a lot of learning and a lot of writing and tweaking .nix files.

          That being said, once you have a setup you like that works it means installing on a new machine is mostly just running a couple of install commands and all your apps/settings/environment secrets/anything you’ve declared in your nix config (like dotfiles for apps unsupported by home-manager) come with you and are version controlled on the system and in code.

          But it doesn’t work like a normal Linux system, there is no /bin/bash among thousands of other things, so it’s for a niche audience where it’s either a server with infra as code or a desktop that requires a lot of work to maintain but has some incredible advantages (like generations)

        • RustyNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah it was my pipeline. But be wary, this is a hard path to take. The os is great. The package manager is great. The nix config language? Hahaha welcome to hell! It takes at least 6 months to get comfortable with it. And still, sometimes you can still come across a config file that will be totally alien to you. And when you need something not in the repos… time to learn how to package stuff!

          It’s not to discourage you, but be warned. It takes time. I had 5 attempts at it before it became my daily driver.

          Keep a working distro on the side. And when you start your computer, think about what you want to do. If you think you can do everything you want today in NixOs, boot it. If you have a lot missing/do not feel like configuring it, boot the other distro. Just start small. Do some little challenges like turning your config into a flake, create a nix os module, split your configuration in smaller more maintainable files, create a systemd service, wrangle with that damn home manager that keeps making everything so confusing.

          And arch is actually the one from scratch. NixOs is intimately linked to systemd. Nix also requires some base dependencies like git and curl, so it’s not from scratch. However you could argue that NixOs is a “make a distro from the kitchen utensils and a recipe”.