Pearl Milling is Canadian. I’ve been using it since the first tariff wave. It’s just as good. Yes, I’m back to turning “Product of USA” upside down.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Pearl Milling is Canadian.

    Nope.

    Owned by PepsiCo and headquartered out of Chicago, you may know them by their old name (same box): Aunt Jemima.

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Sunny Bot is Canadian. Based in Edmonton with their mill in Camrose, they source snd manufacture locally.

  • AmazingSUPERG@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    I did a quick google. Hope this helps people’s choices

    “Made in Canada” means that at least 51% of the product’s costs originate in Canada and the last substantial transformation occurred there. In contrast, “Product of Canada” requires that 98% of the product’s materials and production be of Canadian origin.

  • OldCrow@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thank you to all for the education. So, “Product of Canada”, might be owned by Americans? How can Canadians tell the difference??

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      In the end, I would suggest not buying these products at all. Buy Canadian flour that was made from Canadian wheat. Make your own pancakes instead of using these ultra processed products.

    • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Madeinca.ca is a great website that breaks it down a bit. You can just put in the product name.

      Of course, it doesn’t cover everything and the other response has a good way to check stuff yourself.

    • GrackleBirb@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      You need to a) check to see where the product is made - your “Product of Canada” label does that part - you then need to b) check to see who owns the parent company. For example, Canadians love Habitant soups - Habitant soups are a) made in the US and b) owned by Campbells which is an American company so that one strikes out on two fronts.
      It’s not easy and requires a lot of research but as you become more and more familiar with which brands are truly Canadian (i.e. - made in Canada and owned by Canadians) it becomes easier to buy Canadian.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Ethical shopping sure is exhausting.

          Doing the right thing is seldom the easiest path, but it is the right thing to do.

          A saying I heard a while ago: taking the path of least resistance is what makes rivers run crooked.

        • GrackleBirb@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          100 - check out Sprague if you want a relatively easily available truly Canadian soup brand - you may have to go to a few stores but they are popping up at more and more places since this all started

        • GrackleBirb@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          We do - we need something like Australia has where they show how Australian a product is (made there by a foreign company, made elsewhere by an Australian company, made there by an Australian company) - their labels even show the percentage of ingredients that come from Australia - we are nowhere close (yet!) to that level of transparency mostly because NAFTA and CUSMA have made it something people didn’t care about it - until now :)

  • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Pearl Milling Company is a brand owned by PepsiCo, so I don’t think it’s any more Canadian than the others?

    No Name and President’s Choice being the Loblaws store brands would arguably make them more Canadian (though the companies making the white-label products might be American).

    • OldCrow@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      This picture was taken in “No Frills” today. The only box that said Product of Canada was Pearl Milling. All the other brands said Product of USA.

      • GrackleBirb@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Product of Canada just means “made in Canada” - so by that definition Pepsi is a Product of Canada since the Pepsi products sold on the shelves here are manufactured in Canadian plants but said plants are owned by PepsiCo

        • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          And that just means some part of the process was done in Canada. If you’re a Canadian wanting to buy a product packaged, manufactured, grown, shipped and everything elsneinc anada, it’s impossible to know.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    thank you for your service

    I’m disappointed by how some grocery stores are still giving so much frontage to US products

    • OldCrow@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ok then. Just did some research. WTF?? So, Product of Canada does NOT mean what we think. I think we need new guidelines: Product of Canada needs to mean: Canadian Company. And, thank you to all for the education! Most appreciated!

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        “Product of Canada” means the manufacturing happened in Canada and the majority of ingredients are of Canadian origin. It does not have any relevance to who owns the company.

         

        For me , purchasing decisions happen on a sliding scale with “product of Canada, Canadian owned company” at the top of the scale, and “made in USA” at the bottom.

        But between those extremes there are things like: “made in Canada by foreign owned company”, “made using Canadian ingredients”, and “made in any country that isn’t the USA” which can be acceptable choices if a better category isn’t available.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The only effective enforcement is us voting with our wallets anyways.

        Plus standardizing is also kinda pointless cuz people are drawing their own lines. Like if you live near a Canadian manufacturing plant that makes an American branded product you’ll probably be more inclined to purchase those brands that are at least produced here, if not fully owned.

        Meanwhile others are going eschew everything not 100% Canadian.

        I think naming and shaming brands that deceptively adopt Canadian branding is the best way forward.

        • OldCrow@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Agreed. But when a package says: Product of Canada, and then I find out the profits are actually going to the USA?? WTF?

          • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 day ago

            Totally but those are net profits. If it’s produced here part of the gross revenue is staying here in the form of labour costs, utilities, and taxes.

            Ultimately the demand for 100% Canadian products will drive supply and we’ll have more better options in the future.

            • quick_snail@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Ideally there would be no such profits. We need to outlaw for-profit companies.

              Then the net can go back into R&D or bonuses paid to workers or saved internally or donated.

              • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                We need to outlaw for-profit companies.

                Marx was pretty clear that’s not how communism manifests. It’s the final evolution state of socialism.

                What you’re suggesting is an inverse of what needs to happen in order to achieve the outcome you’re seeking.

                Only by creating a society that provides for every member within it can a context arise where there is no direct incentive to pursue for-profit ventures.

                Outlawing profit, will just create demand for law enforcement without doing anything to replace the mechanism driving people to seek profit in the first place.

                Really what needs to happen is they need to close tax loopholes and actually administer corporate income taxes responsibly instead of incompetantly like they are now.

                • quick_snail@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I don’t see why we can’t provide everyone free food and shelter and also outlaw for profit companies.

                  Don’t confuse nonprofits with non payment. People who do labour for nonprofits can still earn a million dollars a year in salary.

                  The difference is that nonprofits cannot give their profits to capitalists who do no labour for the org

  • BC_viper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Its very easy to make pancake mix ahead of schedule. Can buy local ingredients and just mix them.

    • OldCrow@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agreed. Now, is the flour I’m buying that says “Product of Canada” actually a product of Canada?? I’m finding that “Product of Canada” doesn’t actually mean Canada is getting the profits…

      • BC_viper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I found our local save-on has flour from a local mill about 100kms away for sale. And I have a place that has local flour from another mill within 200kms. So you could try to find things like that if you want to get real local.

        • castle88@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Bulk barn is Canadian, but you’d have to look at where the products are from. They were labelling them; I’m not sure if they still are.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            They are still labeling stuff, but even then it’s not always perfectly clear. Some things are “made in canada from domestic and imported ingredients”, some are “processed in Canada”, and others are full-on “product of Canada”.

            But even with that, it’s still impossible to know who owns those factories.

            I just go with Peter Gzowski’s saying “as Canadian as possible, under the circumstances”.

  • rabber@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    My gf works in grocery store and this pisses her off. Job is hard and thankless enough as is.

    The people who are boycotting US can read labels. Turning boxes upside down doesn’t help anything

  • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    say it with me: we are going to buy whatever is affordable. not everyone is rich enough to buy Canadian made products

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      but some of us are willing to take the hit, and you sure as fuck shouldn’t shame them for that, just like people who can’t swing it shouldn’t be shamed for buying what they can afford

    • ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      You can if you want to. I certainly won’t judge if your budget is tight and affordability is a really big concern for you.

      But, at the same price, or for a few pennies difference if you can buy Canadian, please do.

    • OldCrow@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can’t speak for all Canadians, but I can speak for myself. I WILL spend more if I know the product is from Canada.

    • potter2010@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      If the Canadian or non-US options are more expensive and someone honestly cannot afford to purchase them, even though they want to, I won’t hold that against them. When I say cannot afford I mean the difference between having enough food, keeping the lights on, or some other similar situation. Not so you can buy a more expensive bottle of wine.

      However, if the Canadian or non-US option isn’t the cheapest and someone can afford the difference but doesn’t care or purposely buys the US option. Fuck them. Fuck them with rusty barbed wire.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The brand is Loblaws, but the contents of the package could be from anywhere.

      And a loophole in the labeling laws allows identifiers like “made for loblaws inc” or “imported by loblaws” without actually identifying *where * it was made.