On OpenStreetMap, there’s an emergency=defibrillator object. It can be tagged with information like opening hours (e.g. if it’s inside a location that’s only open certain hours), a description of the location (“at the front desk”), etc.

For example, on the Android/iOS app OsmAnd, you can select ‘Defibrillator’ as a point of interest (POI) Additionally, choosing ‘Healthcare’ POI type will show not just hospitals, clinics, etc., but also AED locations.

Other emergency devices, like emergency phones, are also mappable.


Why YSK: quick access to defibrillators can save lives and significantly improve quality-of-life outcomes. The more complete this data is, the more useful somebody can actually expect it to be in an emergency. Even if the data isn’t queried during the emergency, seeing it on the map could help users know where they are ahead of time.

  • eurodyne@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I will keep that in mind should I ever should I ever start up an independent ambulance service known for showing up just a bit too late

    But seriously…

    Hooray for getting access to this new and extremely important data set, but it really doesn’t help anyone unless you do something meaningful with it.

    Hopefully, in 5 or 10 years, this aggregated data will reveal some meaningful discoveries about emergent care.

    Edit: for all of you shitting yourselves, because i pointed out the truth that this data isn’t immediately useful, boo the fuck hoo

    Grow the fuck up. Downvote me all you like, but it won’t change the truth.

    • charles@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      As someone who works in emergency services, I can assure you that it is worthwhile. I’ve commented on other threads how many of our 911 agencies allow and/or even encourage dispatchers to use OSM as a tool to facilitate geolocating a caller, providing directions to responders in the field, and improving situational awareness. And that all comes as a result of the high quality and rich data that’s being contributed to OSM.

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Then prove it with hard data.

        Your “feelings“ do not equate to hard data.

        Prove it with proof and evidence. show me statistics that prove what you claim.

        Because after every statistical review over the last hundred years of reviews of statistical data, your claims do not bare out.

        you want me to believe your claims? PROVE IT!

        Edit: tantrums, tears, and downvotes are not proof, lol

        • BartyDeCanter@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I can’t figure out if you are hating on OSM or AEDs, but either one seems like an odd hill to die on. Particularly since neither of them are 100 years old.

          • eurodyne@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            So you admit that you don’t have proof.

            Downvote me all you like, but I’m still right

            • BartyDeCanter@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Proof of what? I didn’t make any claims, I just stated that I can’t figure out if you are being mad about AEDs, OSM, or something else.

              Ok, well, I guess I did claim that neither OSM or AEDs are 100 years old. Both of which are easy to verify as the computer necessary for OSM didn’t exist in 1926, and the first AED wasn’t invented until the late 1970’s according to Wikipedia.

              Past that, what the fuck are you talking about?

        • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          after every statistical review over the last hundred years of reviews of statistical data, your claims do not bare out.

          Can you link one of many statistical reviews that you are mentioning?

            • tyler@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              … you literally claimed there’s hundreds of years of statistical proof.

              Is it proof or is it common sense?

              You’re a terrible troll, can’t even write a sensical comment.

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’ve got a phone app (PulsePoint Respond) that’s hooked in with local computer-aided dispatch systems so I’ll get alerts for nearby emergencies. They also have one that shows AEDs and other resources (e.g. narcan kits) from these registries. I’ve been the first trained person to arrive a few times and, though one was super obviously dead, it’s been a useful tool for getting the process started while EMS was on the way.