• BooBees@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      132
      ·
      17 hours ago

      How about we just don’t suck the dicks of authoritarian wannabe dipshits that have proven they can’t secure any information properly and can’t run any institution properly?

      • Saapas@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I don’t know exactly what you mean, I just think for age gating there’s ways that are a lot better

        • Sturgist@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          61
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Like parents actually parenting and activating the built in restrictions for their children’s devices?

          • Saapas@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            It’s probably more effective done at the other end. It’s not like you can make parents parent

            • BooBees@fedinsfw.app
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              14 hours ago

              You actually can, it’s called regulations, policies and enforcement. Don’t vaccinate your crotch fruit? Cool, they can’t go to public school, and you just won a visit from child welfare

              • Saapas@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                It’s not like we don’t have regulations, policies and (some) enforcement. But there’s still dogshit parents. And for this kind of thing, how would you even enforce it?

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Maybe, but that doesn’t matter since automated age verification doesn’t work. Kids always figure out ways to bypass it, and it snares unlucky adults all the time.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Yeah, that’s why you monitor what the kids you’re responsible for are doing on the internet. It’s trivial to setup parental controls on a network.

            • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Hell naw, that’s an arbitrary take. There’s no “child things” or “adult things”, nor “male things” or “female things”, just things, and the “male”/“female”/“child”/“adult” is an arbitary tag we put on them.

              And even if there are some things that aren’t so good for the child to see, the only correct way to address that is educating them, guiding them, listening to them and, over all, treating them as humans, the “we need to block this to children” is totally adultist.

              • Saapas@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                And even if there are some things that aren’t so good for the child to see

                That’s what people mean by “not all stuff is for kids”

                • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  No, “not all stuff is for kids” means “kids should never watch this”, and what I’m saying is “kids can see this with the appropiate tutoring and supervision”, these are two really distinct things.

                  • Saapas@piefed.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    30 minutes ago

                    I think it’s more “we should try to get kids see less of this”, nobody thinks laws about age restrictions gets them all, that’s just unrealistic

        • ramble81@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          16 hours ago

          That’s the issue. We don’t need nanny’s to age gate us on the internet. All it does is create a very short path to removing anonymity on the internet

          • Saapas@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Don’t mind some age gating tbh. It would have to be pretty convenient and anonymous though.

              • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Easy. You set the age in the os (or age range) per system account.

                Apps can then request this and allow/ deny based on it. Requires admin / sudo to update age range.

                No need for 3rd parties, id or anything else.

                If parents are concerned about it they can implement it easily. If not, they can ignore it.

                • genzboomer@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  So any unchecked web/app developer can see if a child is visiting their site? No thanks. This will make children less safe.

                  I will VPN to mars before I upload my ID, or that of my child for that matter. Not a chance in hell.

                  • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    Why does it need to be verified? If the parents set it up as an adult they can’t be mad when its treated as an adult?

                  • BooBees@fedinsfw.app
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    14 hours ago

                    And which of those systems are secure themselves, oses and their manufacturers - the answer is none. None are secure enough to trust that private information on mandatory verification systems. Not the base systems nor any systems that would share any approval tokens.

              • Saapas@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                Well the implementation is going to be that you prove your age to the id app that only saves the info that you’re over 18. Then the id app just tells that info to the website (or app or whatever I guess). So the site doesn’t know who is trying to prove their age or even what their age is, just that they’re over 18.

                It would be nice to have that sort of quick and easy app for verifying your personal information too. I don’t think we have one where I live. We always use a bank for that and that’s more hassle than I’d like

                • Goodeye8@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  And how would that app verify you’ve given your actual age? Now you need to deanonymize yourself to that app and while random sites might not know who you are the app does and the app also knows every site you visit (that requests your age).

                  So no, that’s no longer anonymous. In practice that’s just your government (as that’s the most likely source of authority to verify your age) tracking what you’re doing on the web. Is that really preferable to parents parenting their children?

                  • Saapas@piefed.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    16 minutes ago

                    You can use a driver’s license or your bank. Different methods to verify it to the app. After verification, the app won’t save the info, just the knowledge that you’re over 18.

                    the app also knows every site you visit (that requests your age)

                    Not much of a worry locally. Disabling history is probably included in this (sort of porn mode/incognito, same as your browser). The info isn’t much use locally anyway

                    In practice that’s just your government (as that’s the most likely source of authority to verify your age) tracking what you’re doing on the web.

                    Government knows you’ve verified the app but they don’t know what you’re using the app for, it doesn’t have phone home. Your app is giving the site a generated cryptographic key, the site compares that to see if it is a valid key and then accepts it. The key doesn’t carry your personal info with it, so the central db doesn’t know who is being asked about, just whether the key is valid (so someone is 18+)

                  • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 hours ago

                    The app is from the government and open source at every endpoint. You can see for yourself that it doesn’t track activity.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I think no ASL covers it for the Internet. Going against the most basic rule is kind of ridiculous.

          • Saapas@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            If it’s going to be implemented imo it’s better to do with a privacy respecting centralized fashion than sending your id pics all over the place

              • Saapas@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                You can protect the identity and all other info of the person than if they’re over 18 or not. I think that’s a lot better than the other ways sites are now using.

                Unless you think it of just as bad because a site knowing if you’re 18+ is a violation of privacy, so might as well give them everything haha

                • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  15 hours ago

                  Your arguing for the elimination of privacy as a solution to privacy.

                  You are naive if you think this is anything other than a demand from advertisers to ensure it is human being advertised to and not a bot.

                  • Saapas@piefed.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    13 hours ago

                    I don’t think you understand the situation. They’re already doing the id verification. They’re not going to stop with that. I’d much prefer telling a site I’m 18+ than having to send in photos of my id to every random website out there. 🤷‍♂️

      • Saapas@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They’re already doing the verification and it’s not going away. I definitely prefer a better way to do it

        • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          13 hours ago

          That “it’s not going away” attitude is the fucking problem…

          We should fucking fight it, either by good or by bad, because that defeatism is what they want, they want us to think that TINA, then, little by little, force ourselves to do things that at first would seem unacceptable to us.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That…doesn’t work. Just because you saw one dumb YouTuber say something doesn’t make it true.

      • Saapas@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’m not sure if there’s some popular video you’re talking about but I’m talking about the EU ID proposal. Haven’t seen any videos about it