GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 1 month agoSteve Wilhitelemmy.zipimagemessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1353file-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
arrow-up1353imageSteve Wilhitelemmy.zipGolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square89fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 month agoMy problem is that we already have a word jiff, meaning a short amount of time. The overlap in use is minimal, but why add ambiguity. And don’t get me started on to, too, and two.
minus-squareKrauerking@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoTheir, there, they’re. Its ok that you can’t tell those words apart. But also don’t ask people to not do what you can’t understand? Or do people in wheelchairs boo at the Olympics?
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoEye think my point is two reduce ambiguity is a good thing.
My problem is that we already have a word jiff, meaning a short amount of time. The overlap in use is minimal, but why add ambiguity.
And don’t get me started on to, too, and two.
Their, there, they’re.
Its ok that you can’t tell those words apart.
But also don’t ask people to not do what you can’t understand? Or do people in wheelchairs boo at the Olympics?
Eye think my point is two reduce ambiguity is a good thing.