• sumsinj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Huh I Didn’t say that and didn’t notice you could read it like that. I meant I dont need to know more. I know a reference and that reference has a tragic backstory to it and I don’t want to traumatize myself by knowing the actual backstory. Thank you for telling me

      • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        thats all I need to know about that.

        Yeah it was this little detail that reads that way.

        By all means, avoid the details as needed for your own mental health. I really understand that reaction. As long as it isn’t in a dismissive way of course.

    • korazail@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      There’s a ton of bad shit going on in the world, and I can’t affect 99.999% of it directly. My empathy battery is fucking dry at this point and while I do know about this situation, I know there are hundreds if not thousands of others I don’t know about.

      For my mental health, I could imagine limiting my exposure to additional horrific things if I could.

      Every time something like this hits national news, I use it to send my state leadership another request asking them to make a new category in the statute renaming ‘sexual battery’ (paraphrased, sexual contact without consent) to ‘rape’ if there is intoxication involved.

      Right now my state is [misdemenor]no consent => [felony]underage; active-no; active-no with violence.

      I want a felony non-consent with intox, and I want the law to have very limited requirements for the victim to prove intoxication, since it might be days or even months later that the victim is able to speak up.