So you mean to tell me they had the technology the whole time to make upgraded modular chips and sell them for pre-existing computer architecture but chose not to because they knew people would pay for the shiny new toys.

There’s a chip crisis and SUDDENLY!!! We’re all able to use new technologies on old computer architectures…

Call it supply and demand but I think that’s fucked up nm which way you look at it.

I read that and then immediately thought to myself, so they just chose not to release upgrades for old architectures and speed released a shit load of new hardware they knew people would pay OTA for.

This whole time they could’ve actually been making old computers better than they are and make it so the consumer didn’t have to spend a fuck load on upgrades but waited till a chip shortage to do it…

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We’re all able to use new technologies on old computer architectures…

    Except we’re not? They’re still the same raptor lake CPUs. Maybe a bump in clock speed, maybe a change in core counts. But the underlying technology is still the exact same. The only new tech I’d expect on these boards is WiFi 7 instead of 6e. But most WiFi cards on desktop are M.2 and you can already swap them out.

    The only mew thing is that they’re making them again, and making new versions of them. Otherwise it’s the same stuff. It’s just giving people a second chance to upgrade to this older stuff.

  • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Feel like it’s more “when designing an upgrade you do it all at once not piecemeal” so it never made sense to use old tech before because you’ll just cause a bottleneck.

    Even though I still feel like using “the fastest” ram used to just end up giving you more problems and crashes…

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    AI is causing human regression. That’s what this is.

    Is one thing to poison the minds of idiots, but this is technological regression.

    Things are getting bad.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      i would say it’s causing a capitalism growth spurt which is “too fast” for the owning class to really keep up, especially with more and more working class realizing capitalism is the problem, not ai, chips, socket types…

      i am hoping this growth will be what will cause its downfall.

  • toddestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    8 hours ago

    These are only “new” chips in a marketing sense.

    From a tech standpoint, they’re more or less the same chips that Intel was making for LGA1700 3-4 years ago refreshed with a new name and model number. They may have slight tweaks to the clocks and the core configs, but other than that there’s really nothing new about them. It’s the same silicon that Intel launched back in 2022.

    The only reason Intel is doing this is because LGA1700 supports DDR4 and that’s kept the demand for it alive with how expensive DDR5 is now.

    • DraconicSun@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Some of those chips have new configurations and power demands. There’s now a 8+12 that is 65w, and the substitute for the 14600K is a 8+8.

      I currently have a 13700K, but if one of those new CPUs have a 8+12 version that’s better than the 14700K and doesn’t turn into a literal furnace I’ll be interested in getting one.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The change in tdp doesn’t really change how the chip fundamentally acts. If you want a non furnace CPU then underclock it and power limit it. Maybe these new CPUs are 0.1% more power efficient as the manufacturing process has improved. But other than the core counts you can do the exact same thing with the existing chips.

    • berty@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      No.

      We’re talking about fresh spins on Raptor Lake and Alder Lake here, which previously made up the 12th/13th/14th Gen, and were last released as a major launch in 2023.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Lol remember when they software locked LGA1511 to prevent 8th and 9th gen CPUs from working on existing 6th/7th gen motherboards, and then the modding community bypassed it with some BIOS mods and Teflon tape.

    This whole time they could’ve actually been making old computers better than they are and make it so the consumer didn’t have to spend a fuck load on upgrades but waited till a chip shortage to do it…

    This isn’t anything new in the component industry. Nvidia is even more guilty of this with their RTX ray tracing scam which now looks comically small next to their subsequent AI bubble.

    I’ve personally preferred AMD for this reason because they actually thought ahead of Intel on several occasions like x64, multicore processors, more efficient laptop CPU power consumption, actually funding next gen hardware specs, etc.

    In my eyes, the last time Intel was even “on top” of AMD was the skylake overclock era where single thread performance was still sought after heavily.

    Hilariously though my servers are all Intel xeons because of their sheer production volume making used parts much cheaper than AMD.

  • ZeroPoke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Memory controllers used to be on the motherboards. So your motherboard would determine the type of RAM you used.

    As you may know the something called the chipset these days they used to be called south bridges and we had a north bridge. And the North bridge had things like Memory Controller and other IO stuff. South Bridge hasn’t changed much in terms of what it does. More IO.

    It’s basically like cache tiers. The closer you are to the CPU the faster you can be.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      For…40 years? Demand for older consumer CPUs has dropped to zero over a few years because the new ones are demonstrably more capable and basically the same price. That’s the whole idea behind Moore’s Law. There are niche applications where that hasn’t been true that were mostly filled by recycled hardware or single board computers. But in general people want the more capable device.

      There’s a whole conversation to be had about software bloat that that chain enabled but planned obsolescence it ain’t.

      • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I think they’re talking about planned obsolescence for the mobo / socket not the CPU. Yeah most people want the latest CPU but they don’t necessarily want a mobo upgrade too, but Intel will release a new socket so that you have to get the new mobo.

        If they just released an updated CPU on an old socket plenty of people would buy that but Intel chose not too to juice mobo sales.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think a really good ‘for instance’ of what we are talking about is the Pentium Overdrive released in the early-mid 90s. It was a Pentium class processor designed to fit the 486 (previous generation, also where the Pent part of Pentium came from) socket. They have never not been able to backport new instruction sets they just don’t and now we have even more evidence of that.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I mean AMD has been able to reuse sockets for multiple generations of actual new cpus. Intel has just never done it that way.

  • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Since I was a wee lad, when the internet was just an idea, to this day, it’s the first time that “innovation” doesn’t go “higher, further, faster!” But the opposite…

    • BlueWhiteGreenDougFir@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I don’t know about you, but I’ve gotten sadly accustomed to tech “innovation” being more about novel ways of squeezing money out of people way more often than “higher, further, faster” or anything that makes our lives easier, more interesting, or more enjoyable.

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Hence i said “innovation”… It was rarely really an innovation. And the more recent, the more your description fits.

        Sadly so, I might add.

  • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    they had the technology the whole time to make upgraded modular chips and sell them for pre-existing computer architecture

    I’ve heard that it’s also possible to make consumer motherboards with ECC RAM and no built-in wifi as well, but surely someone would’ve tried that by now if is was technologically possible.

    Maybe the RISC-V RVA23 push will be able to figure it out.

      • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        I wasn’t aware of any for consumer level chips. All I really want is a basic motherboard+processor with ECC RAM and solid electronics with good capacitors and power filters like the manufacturers seem to be doing for the high end gaming rigs, but without a lot of bells and whistles that need to be turned off as part of the “new computer” process.