Theres a chance i just dont understand the fallacy.

How does that negate my point? If anything, it supports my point

It would be better to write down anything on the exam than leave the question blank?

No. Only people who think they are going to be subjected to eternal punishment for not believing.

That’s exactly the concept thats being discussed though? That’s not a point against pascals wager thats just straight atheism.

Only if you choose the correct god.

Yeah. Like on roulette, only if you choose the right number.

Because literally the definition of the word “omniscient”

He might not be. You’ll be familiar with the classic refutal where “he cant be omniscient AND omnipotent AND benevolent”. If god exists then he must fall short of at least one of those.

I really might be misunderstanding here, but i dont feel like I’ve seen any solid proof other than a firm belief that there’s no god.