I know we have our complaints about the browser, but I liked this one :)

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Mozilla is just enshiitifing on a different schedule than the rest, they will end up in the same place at the end. there are lots of pre-enshittifiaction firefox forks that are much better. Try one of those instead.

    • Otter@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’m using one of those, it still depends on Firefox being around

        • softotteep@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The forks will not be just fine because they’re dependent on Mozilla for the new features and highly important security updates.

          • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Oh yeah? Because famously netscape navigator is still around for firefox to get all of their features and security updates from.

            Oh thats right it’s not.

            • softotteep@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That may be true but librewolf, waterfox, zen, ironfox, etc don’t have large companies with funding from google to push out features and security updates as fast as possible. Meaning that if Mozilla goes down, then all those forks go down with it unless they can find lots of contributors and funding.

        • Otter@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          That’s true for a hard fork, not a downstream fork

          Most of these other browsers are downstream forks. I’m not aware of any popular/reputable hard forks of Firefox