Not exactly self hosting but maintaining/backing it up is hard for me. So many “what if”s are coming to my mind. Like what if DB gets corrupted? What if the device breaks? If on cloud provider, what if they decide to remove the server?

I need a local server and a remote one that are synced to confidentially self-host things and setting this up is a hassle I don’t want to take.

So my question is how safe is your setup? Are you still enthusiastic with it?

  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Absurdly safe.

    Proxmox cluster, HA active. Ceph for live data. Truenas for long term/slow data.

    About 600 pounds of batteries at the bottom of the rack to weather short power outages (up to 5 hours). 2 dedicated breakers on different phases of power.

    Dual/stacked switches with lacp’d connections that must be on both switches (one switch dies? Who cares). Dual firewalls with Carp ACTIVE/ACTIVE connection…

    Basically everything is as redundant as it can be aside from one power source into the house… and one internet connection into the house. My “single point of failures” are all outside of my hands… and are all mitigated/risk assessed down.

    I do not use cloud anything… to put even 1/10th of my shit onto the cloud it’s thousands a month.

    • iso@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s quite robust, but it looks like everything will be destroyed when your server room burns down :)

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Fire extinguisher is in the garage… literal feet from the server. But that specific problem is actually being addressed soon. My dad is setting up his cluster and I fronted him about 1/2 the capacity I have. I intend to sync longterm/slow storage to his box (the truenas box is the proxmox backup server target, so also collects the backups and puts a copy offsite).

        Slow process… Working on it :) Still have to maintain my normal job after all.

        Edit: another possible mitigation I’ve seriously thought about for “fire” are things like these…

        https://hsewatch.com/automatic-fire-extinguisher/

        Or those types of modules that some 3d printer people use to automatically handle fires…

        • iso@lemy.lolOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah I really like the “parent backup” strategy from @hperrin@lemmy.world :) This way it costs much less.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You should edit you post to make this sound simple.

      “just a casual self hoster with no single point of failure”

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nah, that’d be mean. It isn’t “simple” by any stretch. It’s an aggregation of a lot of hours put into it. What’s fun is that when it gets that big you start putting tools together to do a lot of the work/diagnosing for you. A good chunk of those tools have made it into production for my companies too.

        LibreNMS to tell me what died when… Wazuh to monitor most of the security aspects of it all. I have a gitea instance with my own repos for scripts when it comes maintenance time. Centralized stuff and a cron stub on the containers/vms can mean you update all your stuff in one go

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Right now I just play with things at a level that I don’t care if they pop out of existence tomorrow.

    If you want to be truly safe (at an individual level, not an institutional level where there’s someone with an interest in fucking your stuff up), you need to make sure things are recoverable unless 3 completely separate things go wrong at the same time (an outage at a remote data centre, your server fails and your local backup fails). Very unlikely for all 3 to happen simultaneously, but 1 is likely to fail and 2 is forseeable, so you can fix it before the 3rd also fails.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Exactly right there with the not worrying. Getting started can be brutal. I always recommend people start without worrying about it, be okay with the idea that you’re going to lose everything.

      When you start really understanding how the tech works, then start playing with backups and how to recover. By that time you’ve probably set up enough that you are ready for a solution that doesn’t require setting everything up again. When you’re starting though? Getting it up and running is enough

      • andyburke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Gonna just stream of consciousness some stuff here:

        Been thinking lately, especially as I have been self-hosting more, how much work is just managing data on disk.

        Which disk? Where does it live? How does the data transit from here to there? Why isn’t the data moving properly?

        I am not sure what this means, but it makes me feel like we are missing some important ideas around data management at personal scale.

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Yeah. It is kinda hard.

    Backups. First and foremost.

    Now once that is sorted, what if your DB gets corrupted. You test your backups

    Learn how to verify and restore

    It is a hassle. That’s why there is a constant back and forth between on prem and cloud in the enterprise