• humble_boatsman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Surely the free market will protect consumers and access to reliable information and integrity in broadcasting… With consolidated monopoly we can trust one or two billionaires. Surely. I’m sure.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Trump seems like he’s waiting for the two companies to compete at lining his pockets before he makes a decision.

      Very possible that Ellison’s near-trillionaire dollar parent company can win in a slugging fight. But that cuts into his position to corner the market on national media, just as his inflated Oracle valuation is running into slightly-more-skeptical-than-a-goldfish Wall Street investment.

      Meanwhile, Netflix only has $400B in equity to throw around, but appears to demonstrate some real value-add in consolidating with the other non-Disney Streaming Service that actually makes money. This isn’t just a vanity project for them.

  • dan69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If people just don’t watch anything post merger… that’s it for them. It’s kinda hard to but it’s still a fantastic fantasy.

  • Gork@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m imagining a comically oversized credit card, like those giant novelty checks.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I didn’t think Netflix was going to get CNN. Either way, I say let them have CNN. It is untrustworthy anyway.

        • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I don’t really think Netflix’s goal was CNN, it just happens to be owned by WB. Netflix is after WB/HBO’s library and production apparatus. I think Paramount’s, especially Ellison and Kushner, goal here is primarily control of CNN. Even though CNN is dogshit, it’s still one of the most watched news stations in the country, and control of that outlet would likely be very beneficial for Trump’s propaganda machine.

  • F/15/Cali@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Wonder who’d finance that? I can only see companies solely interested in stripping anything valuable from a pair of husks, or foreign investors looking to effectively own a great portion of the American cultural sphere.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Wonder who’d finance that?

      Saudi Arabia

      I can only see companies solely interested in stripping anything valuable from a pair of husks, or foreign investors looking to effectively own a great portion of the American cultural sphere.

      Netflix is legitimately looking to consolidate streaming services into a functional monopoly. There’s a real value add in capturing all those HBO subscriptions and turning them into Netflix subscriptions. Plus, the benefit of adding the Netflix catalog to their own exclusive platform is self-apparent. Given the Netflix model for making movies - make one movie and reskin it a hundred times - this would be incredibly bleak for the HBO property set.

      That said, Ellison has a ton of money coming in from his friends in Saudi Arabia and Softbank. And the Saudis really do seem to believe the future of their country is just a thousand data centers propping up a feudal style caliphate. Manipulating the world’s largest military through their idiot-boxes seems to be a winning formula for global hegemony, so there’s also plenty of value-add for The Kingdom.

      So you’re probably right on both fronts.

      • Asetru@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        The assets of the acquired company are often used as collateral for the financing

        This is so dumb.

        “I want to buy That Car, can you give me money? I have… nothing.”

        “But if you have nothing, how can we expect you to ever pay back That Car?”

        “Well, after buying That Car, I will have a net worth of That Car, so paying you back obviously will be trivial using ownership of That Car.”

        “Sounds like we have a deal!”

        • Pucker8736@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I mean, I also think leveraged buyouts are dumb and should at the least be a lot more regulated than they are if not made illegal, but your example here is bad because that’s exactly how car loans work.

          Normal car loans have the title of the car go to the bank because the car itself is being used as collateral for the loan, just like a house is with a mortgage.

          • Asetru@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Which is why you need insurance if you buy That Car on a loan. So there’s somebody else who will pay back the loan if you fuck up That Car.

            If That Car is worth a hundred billion dollars, suddenly that very important aspect just seems to vanish and you can just buy That Car with itself without any further securities.