It is always astounding watching people like yourself and @plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works so confidently claim that they cannot possibly be the same person due to a piece of fabric.
It’s funny you think that’s what the issue is. Maybe read the context…?
The person who made the meme, couldn’t even be arsed to make sure they are consistent from one sentence to the next.
You’ve lost the plot if it’s not consistent. Of course it’s the same person, but it makes no sense to use images with two different contexts to make your point. It loses all flow and continuity.
The meme just fucking sucks dude. It’s sad this had to be explained multiple times in detail, to now multiple people.
You literally started this entire comment chain because of your claim that they’re not the same person.
It’s funny you think that’s what the issue is
Then you need to be more clear in saying what it is.
Couldn’t even be arsed to make sure they aren consistent from one sentence to the next.
Oh, inconsistencies in grammar is something we can use to ignore someone, is it?
Edit: I was responding to the comment you initially made, not the edit you made after initially posting.
You should probably just stop and leave this comment chain. I’ve already had to remove several of your comments for violating the first rule. I do not want to ban anyone. Same with someone else you were talking to who I am also giving the same warning to.
Yes… pointing out why you shouldn’t use two different contexts…. Everyone else got the point, yet you need it explained in detail, even after seeing other comments that explains that…?
Oh no, ban me for pointing out that someone is a troll!! Whatever will I do.
I had one comment asking if they were dropped on their head after reporting multiple of their comments that were direct insults instead of addressing the context.
Once again, your initial point were they were not the same person. I was responding to that point.
I am not warning that I am going to ban you for pointing out someone is a troll. I am warning you that I am going to ban you if you keep down the blatantly insulting route that you’ve taken with other people. This is visible for anyone to see on your modlog. Either learn to communicate in a respectful way or leave this community.
And yes. You did report other comments. Comments that were removed. Two wrongs do not make a right. You do not get a pass to do the same thing you are reporting others for doing. Shape up or ship out. I’m not continuing this conversation with you. Goodbye.
Show me the insult, please, I already admitted my one insult. Don’t lie.
Yes… most people will think/see it’s different person, because of the jersey inconsistency. Being consistent in narratives is a basic tenant. And this is why, because you for some reason, need to waste time explaining in detail. Instead of spending a few seconds while making it, to make sure it’s consistent.
You’re taking one single insult after frustration at multiple comments not being dealt with, and assuming that’s me as a person? You’re a shitty mod if that’s the case.
All my comments addressed the context and avoided insults, don’t lie to make a point.
Your comments are going way too far across the first rule line and I’ve had to remove several of them. Please stop before I have to do something further.
If you can’t even make sure you’re consistent from one frame to next, why is anything else you’re going to be said taken as seriously? When you can’t even spend 2 seconds to make sure you haven’t fucked something up.
Sorry for trying to have a discussion about why the meme falls apart. If you think I’m attacking the meme content, that says all I need about you, like the other user.
If you seriously think that a minor inconsistency is material enough to throw out any consideration of the author’s point, you’re being needlessly pedantic. We are capable of critical thought and can easily examine the premise, come to the obvious conclusion that the meme does in fact have a point and satirize a specific brand of homophobia, and move on, all regardless of a minor continuity error that can easily be chalked up to an absence of material directly preceding the bottom frame.
If you:
Believe that some homophobes believe homosexuality is unnatural
Believe that the bottom quote refutes that point
Understand the clear metaphor of the homophobes to the pictured woman
Then why does the difference of a jersey undermine the entire meme for you? It absolutely isn’t about your personal beliefs, but it would be very odd to hold beliefs consistent with the enumerated points and still make a huge fuss over a minor continuity error. It’s a meme. I didn’t even notice the jersey difference until it was pointed out. How could that minor difference matter at all to the overall point, which anyone capable of critical thinking understands clearly.
What are you talking about? Look up Althea Reinhardt, the picture is from a training match during which she got injured in December '24
Different jersey
It is always astounding watching people like yourself and @plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works so confidently claim that they cannot possibly be the same person due to a piece of fabric.
They’re the same person.
Althea Reinhardt in the top jersey.
Althea Reinhardt in the bottom jersey in a news story talking about her being hit in the face with a ball.
You can not like the meme all you want but you straight up do not have that as an excuse.
I didn’t. I just pointed out what is weird about the image. It isn’t even that weird.
It’s funny you think that’s what the issue is. Maybe read the context…?
The person who made the meme, couldn’t even be arsed to make sure they are consistent from one sentence to the next.
You’ve lost the plot if it’s not consistent. Of course it’s the same person, but it makes no sense to use images with two different contexts to make your point. It loses all flow and continuity.
The meme just fucking sucks dude. It’s sad this had to be explained multiple times in detail, to now multiple people.
You literally started this entire comment chain because of your claim that they’re not the same person.
Then you need to be more clear in saying what it is.
Oh, inconsistencies in grammar is something we can use to ignore someone, is it?
Edit: I was responding to the comment you initially made, not the edit you made after initially posting.
You should probably just stop and leave this comment chain. I’ve already had to remove several of your comments for violating the first rule. I do not want to ban anyone. Same with someone else you were talking to who I am also giving the same warning to.
Yes… pointing out why you shouldn’t use two different contexts…. Everyone else got the point, yet you need it explained in detail, even after seeing other comments that explains that…?
Oh no, ban me for pointing out that someone is a troll!! Whatever will I do.
I had one comment asking if they were dropped on their head after reporting multiple of their comments that were direct insults instead of addressing the context.
Shit mod gonna mod shitty.
Once again, your initial point were they were not the same person. I was responding to that point.
I am not warning that I am going to ban you for pointing out someone is a troll. I am warning you that I am going to ban you if you keep down the blatantly insulting route that you’ve taken with other people. This is visible for anyone to see on your modlog. Either learn to communicate in a respectful way or leave this community.
And yes. You did report other comments. Comments that were removed. Two wrongs do not make a right. You do not get a pass to do the same thing you are reporting others for doing. Shape up or ship out. I’m not continuing this conversation with you. Goodbye.
Show me the insult, please, I already admitted my one insult. Don’t lie.
Yes… most people will think/see it’s different person, because of the jersey inconsistency. Being consistent in narratives is a basic tenant. And this is why, because you for some reason, need to waste time explaining in detail. Instead of spending a few seconds while making it, to make sure it’s consistent.
You’re taking one single insult after frustration at multiple comments not being dealt with, and assuming that’s me as a person? You’re a shitty mod if that’s the case.
All my comments addressed the context and avoided insults, don’t lie to make a point.
Look at the jerseys, not the same dude.
Removed by mod
Your comments are going way too far across the first rule line and I’ve had to remove several of them. Please stop before I have to do something further.
Removed by mod
Do you need the term consistency in narrative explained to you?
Goalies don’t wear the same jersey as the rest of the team. They often have several different jerseys they wear in different games
And? It’s called consistency in narrative.
If you can’t even make sure you’re consistent from one frame to next, why is anything else you’re going to be said taken as seriously? When you can’t even spend 2 seconds to make sure you haven’t fucked something up.
Seems like you’re spending a lot of effort to find a reason to discredit the meme, when everyone else got it just fine. Pedants are so tiring.
Removed by mod
Sorry for trying to have a discussion about why the meme falls apart. If you think I’m attacking the meme content, that says all I need about you, like the other user.
If you seriously think that a minor inconsistency is material enough to throw out any consideration of the author’s point, you’re being needlessly pedantic. We are capable of critical thought and can easily examine the premise, come to the obvious conclusion that the meme does in fact have a point and satirize a specific brand of homophobia, and move on, all regardless of a minor continuity error that can easily be chalked up to an absence of material directly preceding the bottom frame.
If you:
Believe that some homophobes believe homosexuality is unnatural
Believe that the bottom quote refutes that point
Understand the clear metaphor of the homophobes to the pictured woman
Then why does the difference of a jersey undermine the entire meme for you? It absolutely isn’t about your personal beliefs, but it would be very odd to hold beliefs consistent with the enumerated points and still make a huge fuss over a minor continuity error. It’s a meme. I didn’t even notice the jersey difference until it was pointed out. How could that minor difference matter at all to the overall point, which anyone capable of critical thinking understands clearly.
So both then?
Removed by mod
I was, yeah. And I didn’t, but that’s because I bit another girl and got kicked out. In my defense it was halloween, and I was dressed as a vampire.