• Christopher@lemmy.grey.fail
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Man, this kind of sucks.

    I wrote a nifty script a few years ago that pulls the popularity metric of a song, converts that to a star rating, and writes that to a tag with Mutagen. At a glance I can see the hits. If I like the track, I’ll “love” it (side stepping the need for a personal rating). It’s a system that’s been serving me well for a long time.

    Locking down APIs does seem to be the trend. I’m not sure I’ll look to adapt.

    Giving money to Spotify is out of the question, but I may pay for Deezer or something.

  • Yaky@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Any FOSS / third party Spotify client I used already requires a premium account (I am fairly certain it’s about playing ads), so I was under assumption developer API was the same.

    Anyway, I just stopped using Spotify altogether. I’ll support my local indie radio station instead.

      • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Even the Spotify shuffle feature is built to maximize profits and to hell with the user experience.

        I have almost 2 thousand songs on one playlist and Spotify plays the songs from minor artists (who don’t get paid much) constantly, while songs from major artists (who get paid a lot more) are never played. I’m actually surprised to hear those songs when shuffle is turned off.

        They’ve also recently added “Video Episodes for You” to my home screen with no way to turn it off. It takes up 1/3 of the screen with helpful titles like “Session 105, Hillory Duff”, and “Reinvent Life from Rock Bottom and Become Unrecognizable.” I have never watched a video or listened to a podcast on Spotify.

        When it comes to enshittification Spotify’s got it down.

        Maybe someday one of the other music services will create something like Spotify Connect.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          19 hours ago

          tidal.com

          Lacks a few of Spotify’s features, but the audio quality is great, and it’s cheaper. Plus, fuck Spotify.

          Qobuz is also good, apparently.

            • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I came to the same conclusion., I need a “Spotify connect” type feature, and when I looked, tidal had just axed their equivalent.

              Until a competitor allows me to play music on a headless Linux box and control it with my phone, I’m stuck with Spotify

            • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Depends what you define as “Wouldn’t work for me.” Song library has improved a lot, if that’s what you mean.

        • Yaky@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          For me it was the opposite: Every “made for you” mix and playlist is fairly popular songs from artists that I like… But they are always the same few dozen songs, just shuffled in different order.

          Video suggestions seem to appear if/after you listen to podcasts or audiobooks. I had them, my partner did not.

          • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            My “Made for You” has occasional popular artists but most of the songs are from people who are relatively unknown. The only way I listened to a podcast is if I clicked on one by accident.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I think it’s more about closing a backdoor to free product that was generally out of reach for most people a few years. Free API access for devs has been a thing forever for the most part, but the barriers are now lower for people to abuse it.

        Yes about profits in the sense they don’t want people getting free access to content, but I don’t think this is designed to net them a bunch of money or anything.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Agreed. To me, this sounds like a continuation of the abolition of Web 2.0, the era where APIs were open and nobody was talking about how they’d pay for it.

    • murmelade@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      The 350GB I already downloaded should last me a while. Doesn’t it already get the metadata from Deezer, and flacs from Tidal/Qobuz/Amazon, anyway? Not sure why Spotify needs to be involved.

      • Foni@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t know either, but if it’s not from Spotify the links don’t work, so if they break the API the program won’t work.