• Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You’re not lying. You are printing it as a PDF. Your electronic buddy doesn’t see a difference.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Beyond that, also, what’s so hard about clicking on “File > Export As… > PDF” which is literally in the file menu on LibreOffice at the very least. I don’t know about MS Office, but I would assume it’s the same.

          • Zwiebel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I was helping someone and both export and print to pdf each messed up different minute aspects of the design/layout. I don’t remember what exactly it was tho sorrx

          • Triumph@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Depends on the application. Print to PDF always produces the output as seen on screen, though without things like fillable fields.

            • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 minutes ago

              Output corruption sometimes persists across all different modes of printing/exporting. Some lines in Word starting to go vertical for no reason is one I encountered a lot, the other is Excel insisting on making every cell it’s own list, and it’s usually fixable only by force rebuilding the file container by saving as another doc/docx type, pushing Word to make it from the scratch and drop traces of accumulated file corruption. Funny enough, some of these bugs can’t be reproduced if opened in Libre, that made me prefer it, when applicable, a long time ago.

            • autriyo@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Unless you change print options of course, depending on what you’re trying to accomplish it can get really weird.

        • Print to pdf generally loses the text and just makes it an image though. Which can balloon size and prevent ctrl+f without running ocr on it and saving an additional layer with more mistakes than the original.

          • BanMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Are you sure you don’t have “print as image” enabled there? It should keep it as a layered PDF, not rasterizing.

      • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m going to assume you’re on the younger side. That’s a relatively recent thing. For many many years we had to install PDF printers.

        Also the PDF printer is generic, but the export has to implemented for each application individually.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I’m in my forties. The post we are talking about was made in February 2026. Priyanka Lakhara definitely looks younger than me, didn’t even make her Twitter account until January 2024.

          What does age or how it worked in the past have to do with a post made… four days ago by someone who is either late twenties to mid-thirties at most?

          Also, in those old timey wimey years I was just pirating Adobe Acrobat.

          • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            The age comment is not about the age of the posts, but about how you seem so surprised about printing as PDF rather than export as PDF.

            Using a virtual printer was the norm until relatively recently, and even then it’s still the most effective because anything than can print can use that to generate a PDF.

            That’s how I still create PDFs honestly.

            Didn’t want you offend, sorry if came out wrong

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              No offense taken, just confused because I never had this many problems with PDFs, but as I said, I was pirating Adobe Acrobat for a long, long time so maybe I just didn’t run into as many issues.

    • rainwall@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      This is as much linguistic tomfoolery for humans as it is a con for computers.

      I dont know the history, but the most likely case is some microsoft engineer implemented the “print as pdf” option to get around an adobe restriction in the far past, and now we have this weird convention where you can “print” to only 1 filetype to “save” it.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        Someone else pointed out that printing to pdf was a universal solution no matter the program. Instead of each program having to make their own export option.

        • rainwall@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 minutes ago

          Thats not 100% correct. This didnt use to be an option, nor is pdf the default printing “format” used by printers. Thats more PCL.

          “Print to pdf” was added to Windows at some point after PDF became a common file format.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      When you are saving it as a .txt file, you are printing it as a .txt file, the computer sees no difference.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I haven’t looked at the printer driver interface on various different operating systens, but I imagine programmatically you don’t write ACSII text directly to it, the way you would with file io calls. Though on Linux you have “lpr” where you can pipe text directly to the command. It’s possible a printer could natively support this, but clearly it would be a different interface to render anything more complex than ascii text.

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’m sorry but I am the head of printing operations at work and I can assure you, that is exactly how computers work.

          • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Oh! Apologies sir. I didn’t realize you were the one casting the printer summoning seances from that side of the veil. You know if you ever need support you can draw out the four runes on the back of the book.

    • Zwiebel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Err you are handing the file off to a pdf converter programm that acts like a print driver. So yes you are lying to your text programm

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        pdf is a container format for code parsed by printers. there are no lies, just a virtual printer.