Maybe the right means that. Here in the real world, we mean wall street, shipping all of our factory jobs to other low cost countries to exploit their workforce and undercut wage and environmental laws. But don’t let me get in the way of you stroking off the democrats that betrayed us and embraced globalism and allowed the president to do an end run around them on trade.
By keeping establishment democrats in charge you guarentee the republicans will win. How do you not get that?
But no, keep blaming the voters for rejecting the candidates with the platforms they’ve made clear for decades they will reject and only grudgingly choose every other time only as a rejection of the other party. Feel free to get worse every cycle and coast off of browbeating everyone into voting for the less bad option, even though we know that won’t reliably win, and republicans are planning on fixing elections, meaning they only have (had, thanks pal,) to win once.
What is the word for when you keep doing the same thing expecting different results? That seems to describe you here. As you pass the blame for doomed to fail strategies to justify keeping those same people in power to fail again, in perhaps the last chance before elections are fixed beyond recall, and make no mistake, they already are fixed beyond whatever milquetoast democrat playing to a mythical center voter that wants to get fucked by corporations but with crumbs allocated to them and kinder words.
I already tagged you as a third party supporter weeks ago. No need to further prove you are a useful idiot for Republicans and therefore opposite to everything you transparently lie about believing.
You manage to be on the exact same page, yet completely miss the point.
This person is so close.
I hate to say it, but you are “this person”. Nobody is glorifying democrats here. There are rich fucks, and there are poor people suffering the consequences. Period.
Tis you missing the point. The person I responded to just condemned everyone opposing globalists, and globalism, as anti jewish, because the far right co-opted anti globalism and identified jews as the culprits, rather than Wall Street, and big money.
Globalism, globalists, is not synonomous with “jews” at all, and that type of reactionary response, to defend or reject completely something unfairly attacked or supported by the right, is what loses credibility, and furthers captured interests remaining captured.
When the republicans want to make the fda worse, and attack them for whatever, we (you,) will defend everything about the fda, even though in reality we know they have for decades been run by pharma board members and executives and lobbyists that have ratfucked them for 40 years. Defend against unfair attacks, don’t defend their fact free campaigns to schedule a plant with demonstrably false arguments, and the like.
Likewise the far right conflating the abuses of wall street in globalism with jews shouldn’t lead you to support wall street’s globalism. Oppose the incorrect conflation of globalism with one group of people when it’s many groups of big monied interests.
It’s about too dumb to have to argue, which makes sense since you didn’t actually make a reasoned argument but a rather nonsensical refutation of an ill defined point.
Literally never heard a single person use that term who wasn’t an Alex jones psycho and they definitely mean Jews when they say it. Even reading your messages here expanding on this, it feels like a fever dream describing positions no one actually holds. I’ve heard a lot of different viewpoints and this is a first for me.
Bottom line, you need a new term. You don’t get to speak the language of racist conspiracy wack jobs and then blame everyone else for noticing.
You have no idea what you are talking about, globalism has been used for 30 years, and there were huge left protests in Seattle and elsewhere as such.
Bottom line, you think you know things without having learned them, meaning you have no credibility, and that you can be tooled by malign interests to manipulate your fellow citizens to ill outcomes.
Bottom line, you think you know things without having learned them, meaning you have no credibility, and that you can be tooled by malign interests to manipulate your fellow citizens to ill outcomes.
Weird to end a comment by directly addressing yourself, but good on your for recognizing
Pathetic, your argument is basically the same as excusing all epstein conspirators because Q co opted it.
Too dumb to refute but here we are. I recognize your name too, this isn’t your first wrong-headed opinion backed by personal attacks when questioned. Which makes sense because you can’t use reason.
Sure? Maybe the left doesn’t realize that the right is fighting the same enemy and the hatred for the right is seeded by the billionaires to prevent the workers from fighting together?
This person is so close.
Billionaires. They hates billionaires, and what they’re doing to the planet. He/she just doesn’t realize it yet.
Maybe they will if they starts writing lyrics and one song ends up eerily close to RATM.
Globalist is code word for Jews in case you didn’t know.
When people say globalists, they mean Jews.
Maybe the right means that. Here in the real world, we mean wall street, shipping all of our factory jobs to other low cost countries to exploit their workforce and undercut wage and environmental laws. But don’t let me get in the way of you stroking off the democrats that betrayed us and embraced globalism and allowed the president to do an end run around them on trade.
Shocking that your real point revolves around getting Republicans elected
By keeping establishment democrats in charge you guarentee the republicans will win. How do you not get that?
But no, keep blaming the voters for rejecting the candidates with the platforms they’ve made clear for decades they will reject and only grudgingly choose every other time only as a rejection of the other party. Feel free to get worse every cycle and coast off of browbeating everyone into voting for the less bad option, even though we know that won’t reliably win, and republicans are planning on fixing elections, meaning they only have (had, thanks pal,) to win once.
What is the word for when you keep doing the same thing expecting different results? That seems to describe you here. As you pass the blame for doomed to fail strategies to justify keeping those same people in power to fail again, in perhaps the last chance before elections are fixed beyond recall, and make no mistake, they already are fixed beyond whatever milquetoast democrat playing to a mythical center voter that wants to get fucked by corporations but with crumbs allocated to them and kinder words.
Maybe you can run with Liz Cheney as VP!
I already tagged you as a third party supporter weeks ago. No need to further prove you are a useful idiot for Republicans and therefore opposite to everything you transparently lie about believing.
Who gives a fuck what you think?
It’s been really fun, pretending with you that you don’t have insidious ulterior motives, but I grow tired of this bullshit. Blocked.
You. That would be the reason you keep badgering me about your inalienable right to speak like an antisemite
You manage to be on the exact same page, yet completely miss the point.
I hate to say it, but you are “this person”. Nobody is glorifying democrats here. There are rich fucks, and there are poor people suffering the consequences. Period.
Tis you missing the point. The person I responded to just condemned everyone opposing globalists, and globalism, as anti jewish, because the far right co-opted anti globalism and identified jews as the culprits, rather than Wall Street, and big money.
Globalism, globalists, is not synonomous with “jews” at all, and that type of reactionary response, to defend or reject completely something unfairly attacked or supported by the right, is what loses credibility, and furthers captured interests remaining captured.
When the republicans want to make the fda worse, and attack them for whatever, we (you,) will defend everything about the fda, even though in reality we know they have for decades been run by pharma board members and executives and lobbyists that have ratfucked them for 40 years. Defend against unfair attacks, don’t defend their fact free campaigns to schedule a plant with demonstrably false arguments, and the like.
Likewise the far right conflating the abuses of wall street in globalism with jews shouldn’t lead you to support wall street’s globalism. Oppose the incorrect conflation of globalism with one group of people when it’s many groups of big monied interests.
It’s about too dumb to have to argue, which makes sense since you didn’t actually make a reasoned argument but a rather nonsensical refutation of an ill defined point.
Literally never heard a single person use that term who wasn’t an Alex jones psycho and they definitely mean Jews when they say it. Even reading your messages here expanding on this, it feels like a fever dream describing positions no one actually holds. I’ve heard a lot of different viewpoints and this is a first for me.
Bottom line, you need a new term. You don’t get to speak the language of racist conspiracy wack jobs and then blame everyone else for noticing.
You have no idea what you are talking about, globalism has been used for 30 years, and there were huge left protests in Seattle and elsewhere as such.
Bottom line, you think you know things without having learned them, meaning you have no credibility, and that you can be tooled by malign interests to manipulate your fellow citizens to ill outcomes.
Weird to end a comment by directly addressing yourself, but good on your for recognizing
Pathetic, your argument is basically the same as excusing all epstein conspirators because Q co opted it.
Too dumb to refute but here we are. I recognize your name too, this isn’t your first wrong-headed opinion backed by personal attacks when questioned. Which makes sense because you can’t use reason.
You don’t get to cancel entire left issues because the right cynically co-opts it. You better hope so anyway.
Sure? Maybe the left doesn’t realize that the right is fighting the same enemy and the hatred for the right is seeded by the billionaires to prevent the workers from fighting together?
The left is realizing that. The problem is that the right isn’t.
The left doesn’t look to me as if they would try with the highest priority to develop a mutual understanding so that joining forces would be possible.
On that we agree.
But then, why? If people know the obstacle, why not focus on removing it?