• LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    To be fair, they’re not geniuses, they’re sociopaths, often with a hearty sprinkling of nepotism.

    So of course they’re hoarding resources and pillaging. They don’t think the rest of us are actual people, and we only exist to be exploited.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They’re actually stupid. Being born into that amount of wealth means one never actually deals with any material consequences and therefore never actually learns any lesson ‘the hard way’.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That innovation makes them the smartest people possible in their view. And they did find an infinite money hack. All it costs is every fiber of their souls.

  • yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    all billionares are a policy failure. 60% of billionaire wealth comes from inheritance, monopolies, and cronyism.

    They are not superheroes, benevolent gods that are here to help humanity, save that shit for the movies.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Nah, this is the natural, logical outcome of capitalism – a profit based society will always reward sociopaths.

      • yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Captialism doesn’t exist outside of the law. Yes, rules are easy to break, so to are fines easy to pay when they are mere slaps on the wrist to corporate giants, and yes sociopaths are rewarded. But that does not make sociopaths the logical outcome. Otherwise, all people supporting capitalism would be the same.

        I say, excess creates the conditions for making amoral behaviour normal. Take away the excess, put a cap on how much one company can take home as profit, reward merits and hard work, but don’t let wealth be hoarded to absurd levels, like NVIDIA becoming the worlds first $5 Trillion company.

        I’ll admit I’m pretty stupid, this is just my belief. I used to think capitalism was the problem, but really, humans are fallible, prone to vices, and maybe not able organize grand social order, imo.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The only people I can forgive for becoming billionaires are people who inherit or win a big lottery prize.

      But in both cases, if they remain billionaires, they’re immoral and have no place in society.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Cyberpunk literature has been around for decades. They called it pretty accurately.

    • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 hours ago

      God they nailed it. Dystopian architecture crumbling for everyone else while billionaire CEOs live in giant mansions and party on yachts. While the working class is bombarded by sex and gambling ads.

      Truly this is fucking hell.

    • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I don’t think they called it. I think these techbros don’t have any ideas of their own so they’re just taking the worst ideas authors could come up with and calling it their own. None of their companieshave actually made anything new. They just throw a shiny coat of paint on what science fiction has warned us about.

      “This story can’t stop me because I can’t read I’m too rich”

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The most successful aren’t that much more intelligent than average. Their path to success isn’t their unique intelligence.

  • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The invention isn’t yo sell ads, it’s to offer a service to manipulate the mass. Making them buy things is just to extract a bit of money, making them vote a certain way, making them want to look a certain way, donate a certain way, hate a certain people, defend a certain way of life. All that is really what’s making them rich with their innovation.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This sounds like whoever drives them to do this is interested in more than just money, so what is their motivation? If it were that simple, could we just infiltrate and replace this secret cabal, who would then drive the billionaires to do good?

  • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Just think about all the good a really dedicated billionaire could do. Of course nearly all of them have “charities”, but most of them are tax doges or just a really small fraction of their wealth goes into them or they are just there to paint them in a favorite light.

    One of their favorite “cheats” is the following: donate all your wealth to a charity you created and have 100% control of. Charity is tax exempt and you simply control the wealth of the charity instead of your own - still doing everything you did before, but now without taxes and you can claim that you are a GREAT philanthropist.

    You might have some duties as a charitable organization, but since you can choose where the charity is located that is probably not a problem.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Their innovation is that they have stolen all our data, yes… But to fail to notice that they’ve used it to leverage influence and political favours to make themselves the most wealthy and powerful people on earth is blind.