• ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Either you’re describing anarchism with new words or you’ve got some really weird views.

    It’s not new, I assure you. Libertarian Socialist is label that goes back to 1872. It’s often synonymous with Anarchism, which I do consider myself to be, but I sometimes use Libertarian-Socialist since it doesn’t immediately bring to mind the concept of chaos or bomb throwing that people unfamiliar with Anarchism may attribute to it.

    Libertarian alone also used to refer to left-wing anarchist types, but the term was co-opted by right-wing free-market ancap type folks a while back. I’m just doing my part to reclaim it :)

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      since it doesn’t immediately bring to mind the concept of chaos or bomb throwing that people unfamiliar with Anarchism may attribute to it.

      Anarchists are the ones that created that view in the first place. If you’re ashamed of it, perhaps you aren’t really meant for anarchism.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Anarchists have never been for lawless chaos, that’s been put on them in a decades long smear campaign.

        There was a time 100 years ago when ‘Propaganda of the deed’ was seen as a viable method toward waking up the masses, but it was quickly found to actually do the opposite of what they intended, and Anarchists today generally do not endorse such methods. I’m not ashamed of it, I’m just trying to avoid knee-jerk reactions from decades of anti-anarchist propaganda.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I don’t know who you’re trying to fool. Probably yourself, but we have plenty of video much more recently than 100 years with actual anarchists doing exactly what you’re trying to pretend they’re against.

          • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            An extreme minority, perhaps, but it hasn’t been a mainstream anarchist position for a century. And accepted Anarchist theory has never in all of its history advocated for lawless chaos.

            Out of curiosity, what is your own personal political worldview?

            • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              It is all the public facing anarchists. They are the face of the movement whether you believe it or not.

              • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Are you involved in Anarchist movements to know that to be true? Because it sounds like FUD to me.

                • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Are you really trying to gatekeep public perception? I seriously doubt there are billions of anarchists that are just too shy to say anything against the ones that are out in public being the face of the movement.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had noticed the tension between right and left wing libertarian concepts. Very interesting stuff. I suspect on Lemmy anarchist or anarchosocialist will get more love than libertarian-socialist. But that’s an interesting name to use in public because it invites questions rather than fear of ANARCHY!