• Sunshine@piefed.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Time to boycott systemd. We’re not doing this slippery slope game. This red flag is the last straw!

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    The stupid thought I keep having is what stops someone from patching the functionality out?

    • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nobody has to patch it out. The OS just doesn’t have to use them.

      As long as the OS doesn’t implement age verification, that field in systemd means nothing. Some OS will have to do that - especially commercial distros based in murica. So the change within systemd is largely inconsequential, but people are freaking out about it - most likely because they don’t understand systemd and what it does.

        • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Because some OS vendors based in the US might have to comply with the law, if you like it or not. System76 or RedHat will not have a choice unless the laws will get repelled.

            • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Bro how the fuck is the law not enforceable if you’re a company in the US? You either comply or get sued. It’s just that simple. How is that so hard to understand?

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Or people realise it’s the thin edge of the wedge.

        Look how much governments abuse data retention for law enforcement when the reason for storing the data is not for law enforcement.

        If the functionality is already in the system then what is stopping more governments requiring it or expanding it.

        • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          24 hours ago

          If the functionality is already in the system then what is stopping more governments requiring it or expanding it.

          Because having direct access to your system is something that would be incompatible with the constitution of most civilized countries and would therefore require massive legislative change. If a government is planning to do that, an additional field in systemd won’t be the change that tips the scales.

          • RedWedding@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yeah sure, direct access to my system is unconstitutional. But bombing places for oil and slavery in prisons isn’t. Nobody in power cares about your constitution. Be happy that your civilized constitutional country takes care about all these terrorists in the middle east lol.

            /RANT

    • xylol@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Then I guess applications will just ask you to put your date like steam does instead of pulling the number you inputed from the system. Makes me wonder how many people were born on 1/1/1900 according to steam

      • Maki@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes. But don’t do as I do and try to patch an existing Debian 13.3 to Devuan on a Friday the 13th by following the instructions on the Devuan site. It didn’t pan out and eventually required a reinstall after I tried to fix it all weekend.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m here wondering if it will be a good time to switch over to Devuan

        LOL. Do you really think that because that thing is supported for commercial distros like RHEL, it would have any impact on the Debians etc. of the world?

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    24 hours ago

    people get so upset but I Im fine with anyone knowing my birthdate. Its 12/03/04 im proud to be um millenial? Z? what one was that year?

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago
        1. just putting in whatever is easy. I like to use a date that is easy to remember so I can keep it consistant especially if it asks me later to verify. I used to use 12/03/1987 but wanted to be younger. 11/11/11 is the gold standard but thats not usable for four years or so.
        • aichan@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          OMG I really I am stupid, I just saw it. I was just in a demonstration so I had my mind clouded with 1312 so I was not seeing the obvious lol

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            whats wierd is my last comment was supposed to start with 1234 but somehow I caused a formatting for a 1. section table type thing. at least that is what I see now.

    • EpeeGnome@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Seriously, no one would just lie to their own operating system. Just the good honest truth that I was born on 1/1/1900 for my OS!

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        its like my microwave going back to november 11th 2011 every time there is a power outage. can’t wait to use it but 18+11 is 29. so just a few more years as thats the gold standard of lazy.