I’m working on it. Maybe. Well, one day. Like when other Left of centre, anti trump, anti corpo type folks oppose the things I oppose in correct manner and degree, duh.
I’m working on it. Maybe. Well, one day. Like when other Left of centre, anti trump, anti corpo type folks oppose the things I oppose in correct manner and degree, duh.
Use size where appropriate, use lean muscle mass where appropriate, use something else where appropriate. Clearly hockey is a case where size is a useful but not perfect metric, so it may need to be taken in conjunction with other metrics. I do not think movement between divisions would be common, as ideally it would be largely based on physical characteristics which people don’t have much control over.
Anyway, I should be clear, I am not overly attached to my specific idea of how to divide up sports, I am moreso just opposed to the idea of excluding trans men from mens sports, and trans women from womens sports.
The way sports are framed in the media/society I think is largely to blame for this. The advent of people generally finally giving a damn about women’s football, for example, is almost certainly due to a shift in the media narrative surrounding it. If the media and the promoters hype up some division the same way they do another, I reckon you’ll see the support.
My suggested approach might not be the way to do it, but yes, transgender people do not deserve to be relegated to their own little box where they won’t be bother anyone. You expressed concerns about whether people would watch “lower” divisions in my proposed solution - do you truly, and I mean genuinely in your core, believe that trans exclusive sport divisions would even get a second glance?
I think this is somewhat fallacious. Just because my proposed solution may be unrealistic doesn’t make the exclusion of trans people any less transphobic.
Yeah, I am well aware of the transphobia problem in the usa ;P
I understand where you’re coming from on the Left Idealism. Its an in-joke on the left for a reason, right? Its just like, exhausting to always be the one who has to compromise. I imagine many marginalized folks from other backgrounds can agree.
I think this is the crux. Like, we can both probably admit this is pretty ridiculous and implausible solution you’ve proposed. (there is no set of metrics that somehow allows Messi in the same league as the best footballers in the world, or that lets Muggsy Bogues, 5"3 in the top division of basketball, but those are some of the best in the world at their sports.) But somehow, despite that, and there not really being a good solution, folks are still transphobic if they’d rather you didn’t break sports on behalf of a tiny fraction of a small percentage of people? I mean it’s just a little ridiculous…
Consider anything else. Disabled people can’t play traditional sports in the same way. Is it disability-phobic that they are relegated to their own leagues and events? If we’re willing to break sports on behalf of one group, it seems incredibly unequal to not do so for others. All non accessible sports are by definition exclusionary.
Nope. But, a reasonable solution isn’t to break sports for everyone else in the name of equality.
We make tradeoffs all the time. Cafes and bars hosting open mic nights is exclusionary to deaf people, should we make it illegal to have one without a sign language interpreter even though that would make those events financially unviable in many cases? My sister, like many, has trouble reading, so struggles with foreign movies. Should all foreign movies have large pauses so that anyone who struggles has time to catch up? Or are we phobic to deaf or those with reading issues?
Trans folks face very real and heartbreaking struggles., here are so many serious issues that affect them. Breaking sports on their behalf isn’t going to win hearts and minds. Insisting that people who don’t think we should implement unrealistic solutions are transphobic is not helping.
To be clear, I don’t think people are transphobic if they disagree with my solution. I think they are sharing a transphobic view if they share that the solution is to exclude trans people. We can completely divorce this conversation from my idea of how to solve the issue. People far more qualified than you or I will be the ones to figure this out. I can only hope that they will not so willingly throw trans folk under the bus.
You mention disability sports and open mic nights.
I’m not disabled, nor have I studied this, so I can’t speak to how they feel about having a total separate set of events. Whether or not it is acceptable is not for me to comment on. It feels, to me, a bit exclusionary in an icky way, but I can’t begin to comprehend the lived experiences of the disabled and how or why disabled sport being its own thing has been good or bad for them.
Open mic nights being inaccessible to deaf folks is perhaps a bad example, because sign language interpreters are well established and if they wanted to make their open mic night accessible they could, very easily.
Anyway, I appreciate that you have taken the time to have a discussion about this but I think I’d like to disengage from this thread now - keep well
Hey, just wanted to say thanks for being clear and polite throughout! That’s an increasingly rare thing on threads like this.
I do hope though you’ll maybe think about this next time someone gets labelled as transphobic for not wanting to break sports for a tiny fraction of a small percentage of people. Until we have a good solution to present them, it’s not an entirely unreasonable position as I think has been demonstrated.
Take care and thanks again!