• captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I’m not surprised, I’ve long suspected the stereotype of east Asians being short is more related to food insecurity and lack of caloric abundance in childhood than genetics. Some Japanese people are short, but I’m tall in America and didn’t feel meaningfully taller in Japan. If anything I actually saw more women taller than me in Tokyo than New York. Also stereotyping as coming from an area with a lot of Desi Americans I never would have thought Indians are significantly shorter than Chinese people on average.

    Also weird to think there are countries where most men are my height or taller

  • squirrel@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Confused by the dashed lines at first. It’s not an estimation of future heights, it just points to the country names…

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The final year or two is anecdotal. “I don’t have data for this period, but I did recently meet a really short American dude, so they’re probably trending shorter.”

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Same thing as Japan a generation prior. Kids who get to eat their fill are taller than ones who grow up with food insecurity. It’s why my short grandpa who grew up poor during the depression and war demanded all the grandkids eat an extra helping as children and especially as teenagers.

    • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They managed to pull 1 billion people out of poverty and starvation, within 30 years.
      Now they have a standard of living that’s almost exactly at the global average.

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Improved health conditions. The start of the curve is around '91, and given this graph is for 19yos it’s probably some change around '72. I don’t know which change.

      • zwerg@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Mao died in '76. This wasn’t some great achievement, but the end of one of the most catastrophic policies any country has submitted its own population to.

        • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Mao died in '76. This wasn’t some great achievement, but the end of one of the most catastrophic policies any country has submitted its own population to.

          Nah. Even if we eyeball the start of the curve, like I did, it clearly starts way before 1976+19 = 1995:

          And upon further inspection even my eyeballed 1991 is a bit too late; 1969+19 = 1988 would make a better fit. It’s something that happened before the 70s.

        • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Possible, but “better diet” on its own should apply to all five.

          Another interesting bit in that pic is India. It was in a rather steep curve up from before '85 to ~'92[?]. Then it dropped, stagnated, started climbing back.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I think Korea is similar to China too. When I went to Japan in 2013 I felt like a giant with my 187cm, but here in Korea I’m just tall like many other guys.

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      In order to know that we would have to break down something like the India section into different castes, and see if there’s a height difference within the group overall group that correlates with the subgroups.

      But I get where you’re coming from. When I saw this was in data is beautiful my instinct was a little bit of a shiver because it felt like this data is informative but data might be a little bit racist.

      And I say that as a 188.8 cm tall person born way outside the selection period. This needs some Southern African indigenous people representation.

      • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Data can never be racist.
        The decisions which data to collect, how to interpret it and how to act on it can all be racist.
        But data is just numbers.

        • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Selection bias plays a strong role in deciding what is racist and what is it when it comes to data. P hacking and all that fun stuff too

  • Quicky@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Entirely anecdotal, but I live in a university town in the UK, and to me everyone seems to be short as fuck. Without knowing that the average height has been increasing for decades, based on local observation I would have guessed the opposite.