• pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s (usually) all in good fun.

          Anyway, we can’t talk shit to anyone except each-other. No one else understands our jargon.

          • osanna@lemmy.vg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 hours ago

            yeah, and besides, we’re all Hannah Montanna Linux bros. GTFO if not HML

          • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            None of it seems to suggest it’s spyware. I agree they do bad practices but spyware? C’mon

            Also linux mint(the ububtu based one) also removes snaps and everything. How can you say anything like that about mint then?

              • Zombie@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                50 minutes ago

                Thank you for the sources. However, from your own source Mint appears to be fine. Ubuntu, agreed, isn’t worth touching but Mint seems to remove the problems with Ubuntu.

                4 If you are a desktop user who values control and simplicity — consider migrating: Linux Mint, Pop!_OS, Fedora, and Debian all offer compelling alternatives without Snap’s structural issues. The migration cost is real but one-time; the ongoing friction of managing Snap on Ubuntu compounds with every package and every update.

                5 If you recommend distros to others — update your recommendation: Developers who previously defaulted to “just install Ubuntu” when helping friends or onboarding team members should now give this advice more thought. Linux Mint in particular offers a nearly identical user experience to Ubuntu’s classic desktop with none of the Snap-related friction.

              • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I don’t have a horse in the race, because Linux anything is better than the alternatives but I do think its funny that this infographic says Ubuntu has pushed malware through apt, but makes no mention of the XZ backdoor for Debian

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yes and no. Fedora is the upstream of RHEL, and like Fedora there are both workstation and server editions. The relationship is similar to RHEL being the LTS of Fedora but not quite the same. A lot of governments and enterprises that have switched to Linux for workstations are using RHEL.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Long-term support and distro-branched tool chains are a boon to the workstation too. And all of lennarts cancer has been in support of dynamic networking changes and wifi devices; no overlap with a server, but they include that shit at every turn. So obviously they’re primarily gears for laptops and servers are a target of opportunity – and their decline in stability over 3-4 distro versions just backs that up.