As the title.

Should there be a new rule added where intentional removal of credits and watermarks from other peoples works be deleted?

Only thing i can think against it is if the original artist isn’t known. Usually someone in the comments finds it though

  • username_1@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    No? Why? The best thing with rules is to have as few rules as possible. Your proposition adds the rule but does not improve user experience. Bad rule.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Is your name “a community”? I for one don’t care either way. I can always ask an OP if I want to know who created a strip I liked if a signature is missing.

    • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      “Only rules that make it more fun are allowed!” Ok toddler-elected-mayor, good luck with that shit.

      • username_1@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        “Who cares about fun? We are here for more arbitrary reasons to ban!” Ok, fascist-toddler-mayor, good luck with that shit.