MTZ@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 hours agoRough time to be a woman. ☕lemmy.worldimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1451
arrow-up1451imageRough time to be a woman. ☕lemmy.worldMTZ@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 hours agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareTanis Nikana@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up52·5 hours agoNot impossible though. Two in January, two in November.
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up39·5 hours agoOr just the four of them together in one go I guess.
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·5 hours agoRegardless of which way it happened, I’d be crying a lot, especially if it happened in the 1800s.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 hour agoFood was much cheaper and you were allowed to put them to work right away. Plus most of them died before five anyways.
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 hour agoAh, yes, the 1800s… When it was perfectly legal to put newborn babies to work in the coal-mining sweat shops of South London Very Tiny Tim: Please, Sir, may I have some WHAAAAA! WHAAAA! WHAAAAA!
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 hour agoNot just legal but encouraged.
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 hour agoEncouraged by all the starvation, poverty, and pestilence
minus-squareVelma@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·44 minutes agoKids as young as 4 years old would be put to work, so it’s not that far off really.
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·49 minutes agoIn the 1800s you’d be counting yourself lucky you survived it.
minus-squareTheTechnician27@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-24 hours agoOr triplets in January and one in November, or one in January and triplets in November (but it was definitely these two months). She’s crazy – capable of anything.
Not impossible though. Two in January, two in November.
Or just the four of them together in one go I guess.
Or 6 at once but 2 didn’t make it
Regardless of which way it happened, I’d be crying a lot, especially if it happened in the 1800s.
Food was much cheaper and you were allowed to put them to work right away.
Plus most of them died before five anyways.
Ah, yes, the 1800s… When it was perfectly legal to put newborn babies to work in the coal-mining sweat shops of South London
Very Tiny Tim: Please, Sir, may I have some WHAAAAA! WHAAAA! WHAAAAA!
Not just legal but encouraged.
Encouraged by all the starvation, poverty, and pestilence
Kids as young as 4 years old would be put to work, so it’s not that far off really.
In the 1800s you’d be counting yourself lucky you survived it.
Or triplets in January and one in November, or one in January and triplets in November (but it was definitely these two months). She’s crazy – capable of anything.
Irish quadruplets?