This perspective is so foreign to me. It’s a valid opinion ofc, which I can respect, but I don’t respect the overt judgement- it’s the needless shitting on people that I think is a problem, and it honestly comes across as insecure and, ironically, a little immature.
In my clinical experience as a therapist, it’s often actually an indication of health for adults to partake in such things.
You talk like your perspective is the natural default, but I think it’s not, and I think this says a lot more about you than it does others.
I freely admit that I lack tack, but that’s another discussion.
I don’t claim to have any clinical experience but when a person consumes media with plot points and conflict designed to have a teen identify with it, I find that very off-putting (without mitigating circumstances), and assume their inner world is that of a child’s.
If I’m catching up with someone and I ask them “whatcha reading” and they respond with a children’s book without any qualifier like “to my kid” or “with my kid so we can talk about it”, I’m going to question if this is someone I want to spend time with.
I don’t know about “natural default”, that might be too generous. But if someone never makes it past their teens, I’m going to think certain things about them.
This perspective is so foreign to me. It’s a valid opinion ofc, which I can respect, but I don’t respect the overt judgement- it’s the needless shitting on people that I think is a problem, and it honestly comes across as insecure and, ironically, a little immature.
In my clinical experience as a therapist, it’s often actually an indication of health for adults to partake in such things.
You talk like your perspective is the natural default, but I think it’s not, and I think this says a lot more about you than it does others.
I freely admit that I lack tack, but that’s another discussion.
I don’t claim to have any clinical experience but when a person consumes media with plot points and conflict designed to have a teen identify with it, I find that very off-putting (without mitigating circumstances), and assume their inner world is that of a child’s.
If I’m catching up with someone and I ask them “whatcha reading” and they respond with a children’s book without any qualifier like “to my kid” or “with my kid so we can talk about it”, I’m going to question if this is someone I want to spend time with.
I don’t know about “natural default”, that might be too generous. But if someone never makes it past their teens, I’m going to think certain things about them.
Consuming media designed for a younger audience does not inherently mean these things, and in fact likely only ever very rarely does
I suppose we’ll just have to agree to disagree on that.
Well, no- this part isn’t about opinion. You’re just wrong about this part. Agree to disagree on the rest though, sure
Nah, you’re definitely wrong. But if you want to think your appeal to authority means anything, go right ahead and have a nice day.