The irony is, that Ai needs artists to evolve and learn more.
“Bullshitting” is probably the strongest capability of LLMs.
Musk doesn’t really have a job, he is the owner class.
This is probably the job that would be most suitable to replace. A set of tasks where no there is not a given “best” outcome, too much information for a human to process anyway and requires no soul. So right i guess.
AI was always going to replace the CEO in the end, its the natural end stage of it.
Of all the people to suggest such a thing, Zelnick is an interesting one considering how well the statement transfers.
Management is probable one of the most suited tasks for an llm to solve for. No given “best” outcome of decisions, too much information in most cases for a human to process anyway and requires no soul. So right i guess.
Prick of a CEO waxes lyrical about another prick of a CEO.
I’ll never forgive them for ruining KSP2
AI could never do ketamine and wave a chainsaw around in public. Those are uniquely human talents.
Elon Musk is useless, and thus cannot be automated away.
Sure he can!
We can tie him to a butchery conveyor belt and let automation take him away!
he’s an owner, his job is to have the money
I feel like being a CEO is all about connections and who you know, it’s barely work in the traditional sense. All the actual work is being done by aids.
And obviously the world only functions because all those guys, Musk, Zuckerberg, Bezos, Gates, they all have aids.
Seeing how efficient and essential they can sometimes be, I’d qualify some billionaires as having super aids.
“Why wouldn’t it take his job?” - Wrong verb. He doesn’t need it to take his job, it needs it to do his job. So he can have more money for doing even less.
Wouldn’t it take Zelnick’s job?
I don’t think AI is ready to have as much sex as possible while human cattle do the actual work.
