• MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is some of the most over-dressed, under-cleavaged-nippled-camel-toed-or-ass-hanging-out gooner-bait I’ve seen in a minute, but maybe the fact I can say that means you’re onto something.

      It mostly amounts to you and I would be in seperate circles, but you do you.

      • Damarus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Imo it’s just terribly dull content. I don’t mind sexualized characters but if a comic has nothing else to offer, it’s a pass.

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Inspiring conversation and thought is far from “nothing else”. I thought I had implied this one delivers fuck-all in the way of “sexualization” unless one is desperate or aversive, but I guess I’ll make that statement explicit; It’s not sexy unless that’s what one is desperate to see or avoid.

          I chuckled at this one for many reasons, not least of which because she would be dry, brittle, smelly, taste awful, voice probably horrifying, as well as delusional, dumb, or just inconsiderate to boot.

          Whatever the case, not even a conversation first? On all but my worst days, I had more game than that, and could draw a mummy that doesn’t look like a water-filled baloon too, but sure, all that’s possibly going on with this one is innuendo.

          • Damarus@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Red cheeks, extreme body-proportions, posing in the last panel with an obvious innuendo. Denying the sexualisation here is just ignorant.

            • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Attempted, sure, but it very much requires specific audiences to land. Did you think the word “delivers” was in there to look pretty?

                • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  My first comcent ended on the note that if you got your way, we would likely never interact again, and that that was fine by me. You didn’t have to treat this thread like your last chance to save my soul or sell me the latest from Amway global, but here we are.

                  I’m not here to apologize that some rosy cheeks and a linen-wrapped body that’s had its organs ripped-out doesn’t do it for either of us. Maybe move on with your day rather than literally chasing things to annoy and then claim you were the one being annoyed-by.

      • rowdy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Right, which is why I said so I can block it. Not that it should be outright banned.

        I’m just not interested in comics where the only ‘joke’ is slim thick mummy wants to fuck.

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I thought the joke was that she forgot what Mummies do and made up something on the spot that just happens to suit her and her victim, this time.

          EDIT: we don’t get the victim’s reaction. Not every dude’s a monster-fucker wannabe.