• mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If it’s shipping by default, it’s better for preventing fingerprinting. If it’s default on the browser, that’s one less indentifying detail

      • F/15/Cali@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        This one took me a second. You’re not the one fingerprinting, other people are. It’s worse for the fingerprinters, better for you. “Worse for fingerprinting” means it’s more difficult to use as a fingerprint

    • 5gruel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      what does that even mean? what aspect is more generic that could be used for fingerprinting?

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        fingerprinting can be based on detecting what resources are blocked, and sometimes also how are they blocked. but blocking will become the baseline, so nefarious companies will have less of chance to tell the difference

        • 5gruel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          thanks for the explanation. I misunderstood the statement. makes more sense that it makes fingerprinting harder.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          A better way to phrase it is “Not every Firefox install has uBlock”.

          The way you worded it suggests to native English speakers that Firefox and uBlock are mutually exclusive, which isn’t the caze

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 hours ago

        no, but no harm either. they use the same lists so one of them will just be doing nothing whenever the other removes something.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          no, but no harm either

          Some harm, but (somewhat) minor. Installing addons for Firefox makes you more susceptible to browser fingerprinting due to fewer people having the same setup. It’s harder to fingerprint your browser if you’re just running defaults