• Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    What if they find out that people went to CachyOS for even more performance?

    • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Cachy uses a lot of unstable patches. I wouldn’t recommend it just for benefit of bunch more frames.

      • Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        So far it has been the most stable distro I’ve run, since moving to Linux full time three years ago, i think they are doing something right, idn 🤷

        • definitemaybe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Agreed. The only major challenges I’ve had with CachyOS are from my Windows VM or from not realizing that Docker containers are the best option for server-type things, like the controller for my WiFi mesh network. Once I stopped trying (and failing) to run that from the AUR, it’s been smooth sailing.

          But most people would just buy the dedicated mesh network controller, and the only reason I need a Windows VM is for SharePoint integration in Explorer, which is a fairly specialized requirement. Even as a power user, I almost exclusively use the web apps for O365 just so I don’t need to use Windows.

          Apparently, earlier in CachyOS’s history, there were more issues, but I don’t think that’s at all true anymore. I tried installing a more “standard”/conservative choice, Debian on my wife’s and friend’s laptops, and it’s been way harder. I should have just stuck with “unstable” CachyOS, and it would have been much more stable. Turns out things usually get better with newer patches. Who knew?