I’m with you on this. It may be useful to get an idea of probably bad, probably good, but not as a function of quality, since they can easily score amazing a trash movie and write shit about actually high-quality movies.
But, essentially, the score doesn’t say anything, more so when masses are involved. Legions of fans of some actor will, for example, score perfect a movie starring them.
It’s generally in the ballpark. Universally panned films rank lower than universally loved films. Cult classics tend to score better than average but rarely break into the 8-9 out of 10 range. It’s good to check the “Critics Score” against the “Popular Score”, as a big spread tends to say something about the nature of the film (High C:P suggests Oscar Bait, low C:P suggests it’s either very niche or very crass or very ideological).
The scores contain useful information about the nature and quality of the film. They just don’t tell you whether you will like the film.
I’ll also throw in that I’ve heard more than a few movie reviews that have changed my opinion on a movie I’ve already seen (typically one I’ve seen forever ago that I just remember fondly or disparagingly). Return of the Jedi was my favorite Star Wars movie for years, but I’ve definitely come around on it being the worst of the OT. At the same time, my opinion of The Transformers Movie came up quite a bit after hearing a few reviews raving about the art design, the musical score, and the voice acting. Same with Princess Bride, which I’d mentally written off as some stupid low-budget made-for-TV schlock until I got into college and had friends screening it enthusiastically.
If you’re just cruising for “decent movie to end the weekend” on, surfing through the Criterion Collection will yield a bunch of gems.
Do people really trust ratings for things? It seems like we are so far removed from those number meaning anything useful I’ve long been ignoring them.
I’m with you on this. It may be useful to get an idea of probably bad, probably good, but not as a function of quality, since they can easily score amazing a trash movie and write shit about actually high-quality movies.
But, essentially, the score doesn’t say anything, more so when masses are involved. Legions of fans of some actor will, for example, score perfect a movie starring them.
It’s generally in the ballpark. Universally panned films rank lower than universally loved films. Cult classics tend to score better than average but rarely break into the 8-9 out of 10 range. It’s good to check the “Critics Score” against the “Popular Score”, as a big spread tends to say something about the nature of the film (High C:P suggests Oscar Bait, low C:P suggests it’s either very niche or very crass or very ideological).
The scores contain useful information about the nature and quality of the film. They just don’t tell you whether you will like the film.
I’ll also throw in that I’ve heard more than a few movie reviews that have changed my opinion on a movie I’ve already seen (typically one I’ve seen forever ago that I just remember fondly or disparagingly). Return of the Jedi was my favorite Star Wars movie for years, but I’ve definitely come around on it being the worst of the OT. At the same time, my opinion of The Transformers Movie came up quite a bit after hearing a few reviews raving about the art design, the musical score, and the voice acting. Same with Princess Bride, which I’d mentally written off as some stupid low-budget made-for-TV schlock until I got into college and had friends screening it enthusiastically.
If you’re just cruising for “decent movie to end the weekend” on, surfing through the Criterion Collection will yield a bunch of gems.