For those wanting to build a Wayland-only Linux desktop experience without carrying any aging X11 baggage, GNOME 47 will be able to optionally offer Wayland-only support without carrying X11/X.Org support. This Mutter merge request landed today that allows compiling Mutter with X11 support disabled. That landed today along with this GNOME Shell merge request for being able to disable X11 support too.

  • Cwilliams@beehaw.org
    2·
    3 months ago

    Woohoo! One step closer to killing the tyranny of X11! He’s almost dead already, just those pesky Nvidia users… (Or rather that pesky graphics card company)

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      3 months ago

      Why? Wayland has been working well on non Nvidia hardware on Gnome the entire time I’ve been using it - since 2016.

      I truly don’t understand the people who make hating Wayland their entire personality.

      You’re in the minority and stuck in the past. Be thankful the devs are keeping X11 as an option for you.

    • Auzy@beehaw.org
      0·
      3 months ago

      I disagree… The problem actually is that Wayland is optional, and still is.

      So everyone was dragging their heels (and some still are). If all the major distro’s set a cut off date, then things would speed up. The biggest reason for delay was Nvidia imho, so now that they’re sorted, it seems things are falling into place faster.

      X11 still hasn’t solved any of their real issues, and its still a security nightmare (which can’t be fixed). Furthermore, most of the developers have moved off it.

      What exactly do you like about X11?

      • pbjamm@beehaw.orgEnglish
        1·
        3 months ago

        What exactly do you like about X11?

        That it works just fine for my purposes. When it does not I will switch to Wayland but I have no reason to at the moment.

      • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
        0·
        3 months ago

        How is it relying on XWayland? I don’t know of any KDE Plasma components that require X11. The apps you install might need XWayland but that is separate from the Plasma desktop.

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      1·
      3 months ago

      I wonder how long it’ll be possible to build Gnome with Xorg support. If I had to guess I’d say there won’t be any support within the next 3 years, because keeping future Gnome working with Xorg is work nobody wants to put in.

      That said, Xwayland will likely keep being around for the foreseeable future.

      Out of curiosity, do you use Xorg and if yes, what’s keeping you from using Wayland?

      • wer2@lemm.ee
        1·
        3 months ago

        XOrg is my daily driver for these reasons:

        1. I mostly use XFCE, which doesn’t have Wayland yet
        2. last time I tried Wayland (long time ago now on Gnomr), it was buggy and didn’t work
        3. I don’t change my setups that much, so I haven’t tried it since
        4. I don’t need the features Wayland offers/XOrg covers my use cases
        5. Wayland drama

        That being said, I have no fundamental opposition to Wayland, and will probably use it someday.

        • Furycd001@fosstodon.org
          1·
          3 months ago

          @wer2 @Chewy7324 exactly the same here. I too daily drive XFCE, never really change my setup, and don’t require anything special that wayland offers. My setup just works for the most part…

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          0·
          3 months ago

          Those are all good reasons. XFCE aims to support Wayland with the next release, so if they choose to use an established compositor it shouldn’t be too buggy.

          With XFCE porting their apps over the setup shouldn’t change much, unless you’re using Xorg specific tools.

          Over the last few years most features I’d expect from a windowing system were added to Wayland, so I expect the drama to cool down. (I don’t even know what’s still missing (except accessibility), with VRR, tearing, DRM leasing (VR), and global hotkeys being done. It’s just apps like Discord that have to cave in under the pressure to fix their apps.)

          Once everything works, there’s no point talking about it.

          @Furycd001@fosstodon.org

          • wer2@lemm.ee
            1·
            3 months ago

            I totally expect one day a XFCE (Wayland) option will show up, I will click it, forget I did, and use it forever more.

      • Nisaea@lemmy.sdf.org
        1·
        3 months ago

        Not op but we do magic cookie shenanigans at work to run a graphic app as another user. I believe that’s not a thing in Wayland.

      • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
        1·
        3 months ago

        Not OP, but I use sunshine and moonlight for streaming my pc to various devices. Wayland forces me to use kms and I can’t turn the monitors off while I’m doing it. Someone was working on a pipewire backend, so hopefully that goes somewhere.

        GreenWithEnvy is also a nuisance on Wayland while Nvidia Settings Panel doesn’t even work. I have a custom script just to control my fans on Wayland, but I’m eventually switching from Nvidia anyways, so it won’t matter for much longer.

          • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
            0·
            3 months ago

            GWE

            The primary maintainer stepped down, but there has still been work done by other contributors. The primary problem is that the underlying library is reliant on x11. This is the same reason why nvidia-settings doesn’t have all of its features on wayland. Basically if nvidia’s on tool doesn’t work then there is no way that green with envy can either. There is an open merge request attempting to switch to a different library that Nvidia says they plan to move to eventually, but it is slow going.