>be me
>19
>autistic khhv
>lonely
>get great idea to work on my people skills
>join a friend finding server
>add foid
>we chat
>shits pretty boring she gives typical one word foid responses
>says shes a history major
>I know how to spice this conversation up
>I think about asking her the classic would you kill baby Hitler to stop the holocaust?
>but then an even better question dawns upon me
>would you molest baby Hitler to stop the holocaust?
>calls me a freak then blocks me
>hour later I get banned from the discord
>pic related
Staff
We don’t need these “jokes” in our server. If you don’t know better you present a risk we wish to not allow in our server.
Kind of an easy one.
I would molest baby Hitler if I knew beforehand that it would stop the holocaust. Its disgusting but to save that many lives its above my personal comfort. its a duty to humanity at that point.
behold, the Platonic ideal of the 4chan user
Terms like “foid” are great in a way, because they make it very easy to identify assholes.
Definitely offered an abundance of context for their conversational partner’s curt responses. You don’t even need the rebuttal greentext, they’ve already confirmed everything.
deleted by creator
Yeah that’s uh… I mean I’m autistic and I was nowhere near that socially inept at age 19, damn.
Also, because I had to look it up:
khhv = kissless hugless handholdless virgin
There’s no level of autism that can get you to think that talking about molesting baby Hitler would be a good idea, especially with a girl that anon is presumably trying to impress. There’s a reason that anon is on 4chan, and it’s not just autism.
Honestly, pretty sure not even autism causes a question like that to surface…
« be me, say I have autism to excuse my anti-social behaviours and refusing to see my own fault in this situation. Probably because of my higher brain chemistry and women’s fault »
“Not even”
Autism is officially the final boss of communication issues
Huh. I can’t come up with a reason for why molesting baby Hitler feels so much more wrong than killing baby Hitler. You could even make the argument that it’s less wrong.
Is it just because of how killing and death is so normalized in all of modern media?
Typical people deal with rape, murder is far rarer so there’s less “reality” to it. Go to a war torn country and you’d get a different response. Possivly “who is hitler?”
But, more specifically, the kill baby Hitler question already exists in the social ether to be finished through call and respond. Branching into molestation requires recontextualization which pulls us into reality. It’s no longer call and respond, and you’ve just asked someone if they’d molest a baby.
See for me I don’t think killing babies is any more or less appropriate. They are both horrifying questions that I can’t understand anyone not being able to say “no” to either question.
If youre back in time you could just work to not create a genocidal piece of shit. Also, this presumes that he was the only problem - there were many other horrible people involved, so there would likely just be another to take his place anyway.
Both questions are just off the charts level wrong to me and worth reporting. Though I bet there were plenty of other things said in the chat which would have also fit this ban message.
While in may ways it’s genuinely hard to navigate neurotypical society with all its prejudice, it’s also actually relatively easy to just not go there
it’s also actually relatively easy to just not go there
Into neurotypical society or broaching baby molestation? Because I’d have a harder time avoiding one than the other, but I won’t judge my experiences as the only correct ones.
When anon says they’re autistic, you better believe them
absolutely deserved
