• schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    IRC prank from the 2000s: if you type /quit playing games with my heart you’ll hear a cool pop song.

    2020s: if you type quit into Google it will understand this as an AI prompt.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    i dont understand why go through so many hoops just to use shitty search engine, is using google really worth that?

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    There’s an extension called Disable AI that gets rid of those intrusive Google Search AI “replies”. I strongly recommend people to use it, because… seriously, they are convincing but misleading trash.

    The two phonemic transcriptions of “disregard” in the first picture are a prime example of that. I could go on a full rant about it, but to keep it short: compare them with the ones provided by Wiktionary, and play “spot the differences”. (Bonus points if you also play “spot the undeclared assumptions”.)

  • TehPers@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    FYI when I tried Kagi’s Quick Answer out of curiosity, even that gave me a dictionary definition for “disregard”. That being the case, I’d trust it about as much as I trust Google’s AI overviews (which is to mean “not at all”). It just doesn’t show up for me unless I prompt it.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      FWIW just searching Kagi (the way someone searched Google here) yields a dictionary definition “provided by WordsAPI”. So it’s actually

      • trustworthy
      • predictable
      • fast
      • energy-efficient

      You can’t say any of those things about AI.

      • TehPers@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Normally, yes. That always seems to be one of the results.

        I specifically forced it to do a quick answer, and it still gave me a definition. Interestingly, for “disregard”, it also covered a bit about the Google nonsense results after defining the word.

    • DdCno1@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Google claims they do. During their last presentation, they boasted about billions of users of their AI. The sheer gall of these people!

  • Klear@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    None of these are working for me, except maybe skip which just displays results without the AI box.