• Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Read and single write capability is an interesting proposition for archival purposes. 8-10MB/s write and 50-200MB/s read speeds

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      I do photography, and I like to keep the original RAW photos from the camera. So, this sort of thing would be perfect for me. I don’t really need fast write access, since I just want to back the photos up and it’s not time sensitive.

      • gnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 hours ago

        What form would that take? They seem to indicate lifetime on the centuries, similar to expectations for M-DISC.

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          60 minutes ago

          Gonna guess glass deformation over time is going to come into play (really (like millennia) old windows get thicker at the bottom), probably why the quartz version of this is speculated to be good for millions of years. And of course breakage. The drives will fail first.

          Sucks to be Microslop sitting on this for years and years and China comes along and eats your lunch. Ha Ha.

          Hopefully a story soon to be repeated with RAM and then chips, about time there was real competition and innovation in this space, too many cartels due to high capex siloing. This looks more like CDs, could be everywhere in a few years.

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          Like the other user mentioned, glass warping/deformation. Although I’d reckon kinetic impacts, tremors, or actual drive failure would occur first (the real question is what are the maximum tolerances before a read/write fails or ends in data corruption).

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    More bytes is more bytes. Flood the market until big AI firms can’t afford to monopolize the hardware anymore and finally collapse so we real people can finally compute again.

    • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      These would be useless for AI given the high write requirements inherent to any form of ‘AI’ in use today; but data centers would absolute eat these up for low-write CDN usage, i.e. netflix which only updates their catalogue once every few days but needs high read speeds for multiple users. So we’d still be competing with data centers for them, but luckily just much fewer.

      It would make (assuming it can fit in a standard 3.5" bay) petabyte+ home data servers pretty trivial to set up though which is pretty neat. 4k Jellyfin data hoarders should rejoice.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Like I said, more bytes is more bytes. Even if it’s a niche use case, that takes pressure off of other use cases.