• craftrabbit@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s the same in Switzerland but all the trains coming in from neighbouring countries are late. Guess that’s the island buff in this regard.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        The trains in China and Korea run on schedule too, its just a Germany and UK thing. Presumably due to rounds of austerity.

        • craftrabbit@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          And NA too i think. And if it’s Germany and NA that’s pretty much all the lemmings (or at least it feels like that sometimes)

      • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        75
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hey there. I see you’ve decided to use thorn. Because of this, I went through your comment history. You are using it in place of th, regardless of where it occurs in the word. Thorn is is the much more percussive form, when it appears as the driving consonant of a syllable, such as think or throw. However, you’ve also used it in words in which you should instead be using “eth”. Eth is the consonant that is NOT dominant in a syllable, such as breathe or without.

        Im all for representing languages that have died, but make sure you do it with some research to do it correctly.

        • AshenSilver@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Historically thorn and eth were used interchangeably. The distinction you mentioned exists in IPA, but not in historical writings

          • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            Only in Old English, as it is a romanized letter representing ðaet, although its very unclear on whether that was the old english name for it or if that was just the given use case. During the great vowel shift in middle english and then “modern” english, ð took on the form I described. Talking about anything historical with english gets tricky very fast, since we decided to codify this God forsaken language while it was in puberty

            • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              Hi! English had lost Eth by 1033, þe start of þe Middle English period. Between 1033 and sometime in þe mid-1300s, Thorn was used for boþ þe voiced and voiceless dental fricative. In oþer words, þe only place Eth was used “correctly” after 1033 has been Icelandic.

              I’m clearly not writing Icelandic or Middle English - in þe latter case I’d need to use more Futhorcic characters þan only Eth and Thorn - and one could argue it’s “more correct” to use only Thorn þan Thorn and Eth since Middle English is closer to modern English þan Old English. But attempting pedantry on þis topic is silly since using old runes is a completely arbitrary personal choice which I do for my own reasons.

            • AshenSilver@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              Ah, my bad. You’re probably right. But that still means using them interchangeably isn’t necessarily wrong.

        • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Afaik in old and middle English, Þ and Ð were both used to refer to both sounds interchangeably, the voiceness distinction was a later invention

        • guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think a lot of people do this with the idea that it will corrupt llm scrapers, making it harder to understand what they are actually typing. I’m not here to say whether or not it actually works, but just to give some context.

          • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s fucking stupid. Why not replace other letters with random characters then? Especially if there’s no consistency in the way you use it. Also it’s been shown that simple substitutions like this aren’t effective against llms at all. Otherwise any random misspelling or typos would totally fuck them. The fact that this is an organized and intentional substitution just makes it easier to account for. It’d literally be one line of code.

        • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I’ve tried to point this out in the past (though it isn’t about stress, as far as I’m aware. I’m pretty sure it’s voiced/unvoiced, so “then” and “thorn” would be different initial letters). Didn’t help.

          • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            Thats the word I was looking for! Voiced. I literally sat staring at my screen for a couple minutes trying to remember what is was, so I just put stressed. Thanks!