• Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      My favorite movie.

      I showed it to my mom, who worked in an office and she brought my copy in to lend to someone. I got it back around 3 months later when eventually everyone on her floor had seen it.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      2 days ago

      Life of Brian, too. I also love The Meaning of Life, but I recognize it’s not as popular.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      In Idiocracy, people take a crisis seriously, the state is actively looking for experts to solve the crisis, and defers to them quickly, and when evidence appears people change their minds. Finally they elect the person with the actual best plan for the future.

      Idiocracy fundamentally has a wrong view of American stupidity. Idiocracy treats Americans as well-meaning but too complacent to care about the long-term consequences. It declares that society’s problems are from a (genetic) lack of useful effort.

      But, as the past 10 years have made increasingly hard to deny, American “stupid people” are actively hostile to reckoning with the long-term consequences of their actions. Ignorance was only ever an excuse. It’s entitlement rather than complacency, and society’s problems come from (‘genetically smart’) people deliberately bending useful effort towards societal harm for personal gain.

      But while it may not have been quite as grating, Idiocracy was already wrong when it came out. Civil rights were suppressed with “ignorant” excuses that were a fig leaf on the desire to do harm. The eugenics the movie takes as a premise - that “smart people” breeding leads to a smart world and inversely for “stupid people” - is itself a form of “ignorance” about genetics that was actively being used as a fig leaf for genocide in the US in the century before.

      But no, I’m sure you “just don’t get” how Idiocracy is endorsing a genocidal view eugenics. It’s easier to “believe” brawndo makes the plants grow.

      • ClownStatue@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        While you’re correct that the movie highlights a leader searching for a solution to a problem, you overlook the unspoken criticism of society within the movie: the plainly evident results of generations of stupid Americans who were too complacent, and actively hostile, to reckoning with the long-term consequences of their actions.

    • Thorry@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      While the movie is funny you should know the basic premise is eugenics. Which might not be something to cheer on, given the current history repeating trend.

      • schnapsman@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think enjoying the movie somehow supports eugenics. The premise is about the correlation between education level and demographic trends, which is a real thing. The reproduction rate is well-known to be correlated with women’s education specifically. Regarding eugenics, historically, the issue there was forced eugenics. That’s a much different thing.

        • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, but the general dumbing down of society is a complete fiction. In reality, someone born ten years after you should statistically have +3 IQ points.

          Flynn effect.

        • Axiochus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, the eugenics thing is frequently repeated here. I guess the point is also that the premise rests on dumb people outbreeding smart ones, and dumb people are poor. But I always saw that as not being the message of the film.

        • Thorry@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I disagree, the issue with eugenics is that it’s absolute bullshit. Made up by racists and fascists to justify their views.

          Genes simply don’t work like that, each person doesn’t just get the genes from their parents, but from the entire bloodline of each parent. Which means we get a huge mix of stuff, some of which will be expressed and a lot of it won’t be. This means children might be similar to parents (but also might not be), but after a few generations it’s very hard to track any kind of complex trait.

          Most people are about as smart as one another, given the chance to develop and grow. Differences in perceived intelligence are often much more a product of the environment, than anything related to genes. Rich families paid for their kids to go to the best schools, thus their offspring is perceived as more intelligent.

          So no the issue isn’t just forced eugenics, the issue is eugenics period. Genes do not make one person superior to another and there is no such thing as an Ubermensch or master race.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    Blazing Saddles, especially since, as they say, you couldn’t make it today. 'Course, now that’s less because you can’t say the n-word and more because all the anti-racism would trigger the MAGA CHUDs.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wish I could find it again, but years ago I saw a video about why you couldn’t make Blazing Saddles today, aside from it already existing/permission/etc. It wasn’t the racism or anything, or how people today are too sensitive.

      It couldn’t be made today because Blazing Saddles basically destroyed the entire genre.

      Prior to its release, Westerns were everywhere. They were incredibly popular, with countless movies and TV shows released every year. Then this movie comes along, points out all of the overused tropes, and reveals the formula they’ve all been using. The genre of Westerns has never recovered. It would be lampooning obscure content with dated references that people don’t understand.

      That’s the real reason it couldn’t be made today.

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The only reason it “couldn’t” be made is that Mel Brooks won’t license his work for a remake. Everything else is “wouldn’t”, including any concerns about people taking offense. There are entire studios dedicated to doing exactly that.

    • Tujio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Exactly! Always seems like the ‘you could never make it today!’ crowd is saying that the woke mob would get mad or some shit.

      Do they think that Blazing Saddles isn’t woke? The whole fucking movie is making fun of dumb white racists!

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, but somebody else already mentioned Mel Brooks films in general. I wanted to highlight that one uniquely because of the factor I mentioned.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            They eat beans and it gives them gas. It’s not a constructed joke. It’s like in Airplane 2: The Sequel where they take the Lunar Shuttle to 0.5 Worp speed and it does the trippy Star Trek visuals, and Elaine takes a drag from a joint and says “oh wow.” Dya get it? She did drugs, now she’s high. Didja get it?

    • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Blazing saddles is a fun and wild ride. I came in expecting nothing and got kind off for blown off my socks! This movie is so much fun.

  • Summzashi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tropic Thunder is a relatively modern movie considering it could not be made today, which adds a lot to the hilarious madness

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Everyone keeps saying they couldn’t make tropic thunder today but I don’t understand why? Other than tropic thunder having already been made, why couldn’t it be made today?

      Is it because RDJ blacked up? It doesn’t seem to have hurt his career at all, it seems most people got the joke.

      Is it because they use the word “retard” a lot? I don’t think that’s integral to the film, it’s more just something that ages it a bit and you could easily change the dialogue and have basically the same gag.

      I really don’t see why “it couldn’t be made today”.

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        When people say that it’s based on their own personal reactions, which they assume every moral and ethical person shares identically. That movie couldn’t have been made in 2008 either, but it was.

      • plz1@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, my guess is the blackface. But they really lean into it, and honestly, many of my friends of color thought it was hilarious, rather than offensive. Small focus group, but goes to show it’s not a universally contentious topic.

        And Tropic Thunder is a masterpiece.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Having to convince investors to back it. A lot wouldn’t touch a new movie without any potential controversy as it is.

      • Summzashi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because these days people freak out more about those details. It was a very different time back then.

        • Kushan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t think that’s true at all. People say “tropic thunder couldn’t be made today” but nobody says tropic thunder is racist or homophobic or anything like that.

          It’s not like the looney tunes cartoons from way back when where blatant racist shit was just the norm, TT specifically pokes fun at the racist stuff.

          Put it this way, nobody has “cancelled” Tropic thunder, it’s still just as good to watch today as it was then.

          Nothing has changed to put the film in a different light.