• four@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I think snakes and ladders is like watching sports. You pick a team (somewhat arbitrarily) and attach yourself emotionally to how well it does just to feel something.

    • Godort@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Is Snakes and Ladders considered solved?

      I’m not sure it counts if there are zero choices provided to the player

        • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I would argue against that conclusion. In some games and optimal policy is the best that you can come up with, and we consider that a solution.

          It’s a recursive game by nature, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t the best move.

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            In snakes and ladders there isn’t a move. There’s not a single choice in the whole game. From the viewpoint of game theory it is not even a game, since a game requires choice. Without choice no strategy, without strategy no game in the sense of game theory.

            And a non-game without strategy or choice cannot have a solution.