• evadersnack@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Are you pointing to a price-performance degradation or a measurable degradation on hardware with all other factors controlled? The latter doesn’t exist.

      All the SEO slop that appears similar to your link (that I’m definitely not clicking) are for PC builders and nobody is making these outrageous claims for server builders.

      There are workloads that demand a higher memory-to-compute ratio than others. Web server? Throw them a bone sure. But they mainly want computing power. Big database? Can’t have enough, and can’t have them fast enough. Especially when a single index can be multiple gigabytes big.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Please explain how more ram can cause a greater bottleneck then less ram of the same sku

      • Dpek@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Have more ram then the cpu can address

        What worse bottleneck then not being able to boot?

        (If anyone has this problem i will gladly take the ram)

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 minutes ago

          I don’t think that results in a failure to boot. Not to mention 64bit addressable space is like 16 QB (though I’m not sure all bits have traces since we’re still orders of magnitude away from being able to use all those bits).

    • L7HM77@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, no, this is telling me my system will choke under any usage type and resolution, but it actually rips through everything I’ve thrown at it.