[two characters are talking]
Vaccines have saved millions of lives you know
[a blue character points at them proudly]
Heh, look at those idiots over there, they believe in the most obvious propaganda
[the blue character is shown doing various faces]
Anyway, did you know communism killed 100 million people?
I’ve seen that 20% of the people commit 80% of the crime
Our military keeps the world a safer place
Everyone starts with opportunities, you have to earn your place in society, work harder
[sixteen variations of the blue character are shown on a multicolored grid]
Crime is out of control and keeps getting worse
Men are natural leaders, women’s nature is to nurture
Billionaires create jobs
Poor people just keep making bad decisions in life
Migrants are taking our jobs
Socialism is when we all share the same paycheck
If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear
If minimum wages go up, everyone will get fired, it’s math
We brought modernity to the countries we colonized
The wage gap is a myth you’re just looking at it wrong
Immigration mathematically causes crime
Developing countries are poor because of corruption
We are the good guys
If workers were worth more, they would be paid more
Universal healthcare is communism
Patriotism means supporting the troops
[a large drawing of a serious Garfield is surrounded by the infinitely repeating phrase]
YOU ARE NOT IMMUNE TO PROPAGANDA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
fuck off, tankie.
Awww, is the D student upset that they can’t even begin to defend their point so they resort to insults and throwing around logical fallacies they don’t understand? Asking you to prove how a strawman assertion is relevant is not whataboutism, nor is it whataboutism to point out that your argument can’t withstand its own strawman standards. Also, you’re committing the Fallacy Fallacy, and you aren’t even trying to support why my argument is fallacious and not relevant, which is itself a fallacy (see also thought terminating cliche). (See, this is how you call out someone for using fallacious logic)
It’s cute you think anyone challenging your brainless Bircherist propaganda is a tankie, makes it easy to not have to think at all. Makes it all the more obvious that you know you can’t support your argument. Watching your type flail when they get a modicum of pushback is always amusing.
no, the D student is here whining “iT is anTIcOMmUNISt PROPAgANdA, WE nEveR Killed aNYone and aNYwaY, thE CAPitALIsM iS ALSO Bad!”
for your own good, i hope you are 12 years old, because then you have a chance to grow up. i won’t be replying to you anymore.
The D student needs to go to remedial reading, cuz that’s not remotely close to what I said.
I hope the same for you, cuz then at least you’d have a chance to grow out of your idiotic, one track propaganda arguments. Maybe you’d even be able to read and respond to arguments actually being made.
You promise?