• FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Never thought about this before but in what way is she a punk if she isn’t rebelling against at least one thing?

      • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I’ll just concile myself by saying she meant punk fashion sense. She loves punk fashion sense but also loves the government and would never ever ever rebel against it. Her dad’s a policeman and her mom’s a school principal.

        edit: CONSOLE. i get so many english words wrong recently.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          Yeah… ‘punk’ is an actual lifestyle, maybe you could say an ideology, or parts of an ideology, or a framework for ideology.

          When you just wear it as a costume, you’re not only missing the point, you’re disposing of the meaning the style is supposed to signify… you’re gentrifying a concept, and very likely commodifying it.

          Now of course I don’t expect every young person, young adult to … grasp all of that… would be very stupid to ‘well ackshually’ some kid just trying to express themselves as unique, in some way.

          But maybe, hopefully, some of em will read this, and it’ll spur them to look into the actual history, the actual ideas… realize that how you live is incredibly more important than what you look like, while doing so.

    • kboos1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Yeah it’s a dumb meme. 1 & 3 are clearly claiming false persecution for sympathy, because the way you present yourself is the way you wish to be perceived and obviously gaslighting. 2 is hard racism.

      It only works to poke fun at the irony of a stupid premise because only one of these things is a real issue.

      • fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        1 is the only one that doesn’t make sense.

        3 though… I want to be perceived as someone with fantasy coloured hair, you are right. Why are you making the equivalence of crazy colours -> attention seeking person?

        That’s what the image is denouncing, and you are criticising the 3rd image, so that’s the equivalence that you are supporting with your comment.

        • kboos1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Out of curiosity, because I wish to understand your reasoning. What you’re saying that even though they wish to dye their hair in unique bright fantasy colors that they wish to remain anonymous and inconspicuous in public. Logically that seems like the opposite. If I also like having unique colored hair then I should ignore that we have something in common and not draw attention to it?

          Please take no offense, I genuinely want to know your reasoning.

          • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            37 minutes ago

            I think you might be confusing a few things?

            It’s not that it’s done for no attention whatsoever, it’s that the phrase “they’re just doing this for attention” is a way that people dismiss each other, and ironically, over-fixate on people who just want to pay for their groceries and leave, you know?

            By being fashionable in socially unapproved ways, people will assume you’re being vain as a euphemism for their relative disgust, and vanity loses you a lot of social capital—aura, basically. They’ll rather think of you as prissy than serious.

            But you can comment on a person’s hair if you like it, same as you would a band t-shirt for a group you both like.