If it’s something you’re gonna be doing infrequently, sure - it helps you perform it smoothly and without much cognitive overhead.
But if it’s something you’re gonna do very often, then it’s okay if it appears a bit random at first, you’ll soon start doing it mechanically without thinking and it’s best for it to be designed around it. This will allow you to insert a smart quirk in this hole left by the lack of consistency. Like enabling you to clean your keyboard in this case.
Ergonomics often collides with common sense, and it’s ok.
![Power On [Bob the Angry Flower]](https://lemmus.org/pictrs/image/0e5d5c7b-228e-430d-8a29-0ffaf46c81f3.webp){kind=link}
Meh, helps with accidental presses and it’s fine for the power button to require a slightly more deliberate action imo.
Turning on from full shutdown when you open the lid on the other hand sends me flying
To turn off? Yes, turn on? No
I could say consistency is a good design pattern.
If it’s something you’re gonna be doing infrequently, sure - it helps you perform it smoothly and without much cognitive overhead.
But if it’s something you’re gonna do very often, then it’s okay if it appears a bit random at first, you’ll soon start doing it mechanically without thinking and it’s best for it to be designed around it. This will allow you to insert a smart quirk in this hole left by the lack of consistency. Like enabling you to clean your keyboard in this case.
Ergonomics often collides with common sense, and it’s ok.