• CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I don’t recommend things based on if people are new to it or not. I recommend things based on if they read and are willing to learn or not.

    If you don’t read, arch is not a good distro for you.

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You should always judge the quality of advice others give, especially random internet bozos.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If you don’t read, nothing is good for you, you’ll kill all distros if you don’t care and aren’t willing to learn

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Agreed. Also I would rather read the archwiki than loads of outdated faq posts when troubleshooting an issue.

        I guess a lot of accurate text is intimidating compared to a concise message that is very confident.

        I’ve also seen people just refuse to read an error message. I think this is from using Microsoft products that never have accurate error messages.

        Anyway, I hope people willing to learn try a whole bunch of things, and don’t give up at the first problem because that is how you learn.