• bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Large dynamic range is a good thing, in audio and video. There are a number of ways to reduce dynamic range, if you really need to. Expanding dynamic range after capture is possible, too, but more fraught.

    Shannon information theory gives us ways to perfectly reconstruct the lower range version from an expanded range version, but it also guarantees that reconstructing the higher range version from a reduced range version cannot be perfectly accurate across all inputs. (Assuming a fixed output range capability.)

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m also here to support dynamic range. I don’t want the volume “normalized”, I want loud louds and quiet quiets.

      • fishy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        A lot of people live in apartments or have kids. While I enjoy being able to listen to loud explosions and quiet whispers, it can make movie watching experiences miserable.

            • Soggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              You’ve gotta compromise somewhere dude. Sound quality, neighbors’ opinions of you, cost, solitude, something but there is no perfect answer here.

              • Starski@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 hours ago

                But there is. Having an audio range that isn’t ridiculous, that allows you to hear whispers and not get your ear blown out by the louds. Unfortunately many movies don’t do this, and for some reason you would rather compromise on someone else’s comfort than even consider this?