• BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I have long ago reached the end of my tolerance for religious nonsense. I will not engage in any serious discussion about religious fairy tales. If I want to discuss fictional world building, I’d rather talk about Lord of the Rings, or Star Trek, or Star Wars, all of which are far more interesting works of fantasy fiction than any religious lore.

    We have to stop allowing religion to be an influential force on our government. If people want to embrace religion in their personal lives, that’s their free choice to make, but they should be considered the oddballs that they are, and should be dismissed as serious political candidates, since they proudly believe in, speak to, and get advice and guidance from imaginary beings in their head.

    That weirdo should not be making decisions about the future of our country. It’s like the olden days, when they would take the ravings of a schizophrenic as messages from God.

  • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Jesus was a pro-banking, pro-capitalism, pro-rich, pro-slavery asshole based on the parable of the talents in Matthew 25:

    14 “For it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted to them his property. 15 To one he gave five talents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. 16 He who had received the five talents went at once and traded with them, and he made five talents more. 17 So also he who had the two talents made two talents more. 18 But he who had received the one talent went and dug in the ground and hid his master’s money. 19 Now after a long time the master of those servants came and settled accounts with them. 20 And he who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five talents more, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me five talents; here, I have made five talents more.’ 21 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 22 And he also who had the two talents came forward, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me two talents; here, I have made two talents more.’ 23 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ 24 He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here, you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I have not sown and gather where I scattered no seed? 27 Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents. 29 For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. 30 And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’

    • btsax@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I’m not religious anymore and I’m not making a defense of Christianity, but before all of this the Bible explains that when Jesus comes and starts teaching, he’s going to teach in parable (metaphor) so most of his teaching needs to be seen through that lens. So this should more properly be seen as a teaching saying to take your gifts (compassion, love, wisdom) out into the world and use them to become a better person. There’s also some deeper meaning here that usury was frowned upon at the time so this would have been a very provocative thing to use as a metaphor.

      Of course the main way that people corrupt Christianity is by taking things literally, and if you do that you can take any meaning away you want. That’s how you get a branch that literally only exists to promote the institution of chattel slavery (Southern Baptist) along with pacifist, community-centric, anti-slavery Quakers. And how people are OK with driving BMWs to church and engaging in the crusades and thinking Trump was sent by God. It’s all in there if you want it to be, which makes it easy to exploit.

      Oh also if you haven’t read The Parable of the Sower and The Parable of the Talents by Octavia Butler, I highly recommend those

  • borokov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Jesus today: “For god sake, I kept saying to these 4 retards that men have to find the way by themselves and they basically wrote an How To you guys blindly followed for the last 2000 years ?!”

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Jesus could be here now and he would be seen as a conspiracy theorist.

    Could be David Icke for all we know. But doesn’t matter does it…

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Pretty much any famous person from the past wouldn’t matter one bit if they lived today.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Maybe someone like Luther King, someone super charismatic could create change. People tend to follow these characters. We could use someone like that against datacenters…

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Honestly it isn’t like a lot of us care other than pointing out the insane levels of hypocrisy the right engage in while claiming to love Jesus.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Jesus was pro-choice, though, there is a verse in the bible giving instructions on abortion (via beatings).

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s nah that’s some Old Testament stuff. Jesus specifically calls for the ending of old Jewish traditions. Thats why Jews don’t hold him in high regard. Most traditions of the Old Testament Jesus would have told people to do something else.

      On the topic of the op Jesus would have been a straight socialist. He believed in giving to the state what belonged to the state but also believed that the rich had an obligation of helping the poor.

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 hours ago

    In the words of grandson, “Jesus was a 5’4” brown-skinned socialist, nothing like the man on that crucifix"

  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Considering that the majority of vocal Christians vote Republican, Jesus being very explicitly leftist presents an opportunity to nudge them left. It certainly won’t convince all of them, but there are those who actually value their prophet more than their politicians.

    Anyone who cares about diminishing the Republican stranglehold on America should care that Jesus was a leftist, even if they didn’t personally care about Jesus.

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The fact that weʻve seen a few MAGA pastors openly say stuff like “Well, Jesusʻ teachings were more applicable in the first century and we have to adapt now” is proof enough that itʻs not Jesus they believe in. I want to see this pushed more and more to get them to finally admit that theyʻre not actually Christians, but are actually like Cartman in the South Park episode where he starts a Christian band (“You donʻt know the first thing about Christianity!” “I know enough to exploit it.”)

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’m not one to wear tin foil hats, but I think if I wanted to obliterate a society, I’d focus on the family.

  • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    21 hours ago

    You gotta remember, despite everything we say, everything we’ve written, the laws in place, the rapidly growing atheism, the US is a theocracy first and foremost. The religion is just as important as the economy, employment rate, or the opinions of the ruling class.

    • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      A theocracy that only believes in Supply Side Jesus and ignores the real teachings of Jesus. The GOP would look a lot different if their religion wasn’t just a tool to manipulate their Christian base.

    • HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The only thing that has really kept religion in check in this country is, ironically, their enmity toward each other due, ostensibly, to differences in eschatology. That has melted away as they have come to the realization that they are in danger of becoming irrelevant. Fortunately, the laity is extremely stupid and easy to manipulate (religion will do that to you) and have no idea what they really believe or what the differences are, so they are being led as if they are more monolithic by focusing their worship on what they all agree they love: money. They are also too stupid to realize that this is ironic.

    • forgetfulmeat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah. I am Chicano but identify more with my indigenous side and am friends with plenty of Native Americans. I’ve always personally blamed Judeo-Christian thinking. The whole manifest destiny mindset is insane.

      I mean read just a piece of how different things were before those religions came to this land.

      A second, related factor was the absence of large domestic animals in North America, which meant that instead of the ‘intensive’, ploughing-and-manuring agriculture practised in Europe, Native American farmers used ‘extensive’ techniques, cultivating an area for a few years and then moving on to let the soil recover. Most groups - hunters and plant-gatherers as well as agriculturists - viewed land as a common resource rather than a commodity that could be owned. Tribes and families had the right to hunt, fish or grow crops in defined places, but the concept of a fenced-off parcel of land being the exclusive property of an individual would have been utterly alien to most, if not all, Native Americans. The Indian attitude towards land was part of a broader, more fundamental understanding of reality which underpinned the whole of native life. Although, again, there were enormous local variations in mythology and ritual, some of the essentials of this world-view were shared by many, if not most, cultures. Perhaps the most basic element was the belief in sacred power: the idea that everything in the universe was interconnected and possessed a spiritual force or energy that could affect the lives of ‘the people’ and of all other living things. Gaining power and the aid of powerful beings was absolutely vital: for success in hunting, plentiful crops, good health, thriving children and victory in battle. But power was also dangerous.

      Source: Chapter 2 of The Earth Shall Weep by James Wilson.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      So weird for one of the world’s youngest nations to hijack one of the world’s youngest religions from a place they so frequently fear, hate, and bomb.

      They really are just the plebeians of an empirical nation that never quite got to empirical level, unless your factor corporatisation of the society.

      And they accuse the English of not speaking English…