• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    My guess is not exactly the same; it’s that they’ve made the point they really mean many times, so by now they’re bored of typing it out. Maybe they in fact expect people to understand the point they intend even though they haven’t made it, based on people agreeing with them already, or having seen their posts already.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It was a conversation starter about the gendered language. I wasn’t accusing OP of anything nor demonizing them for it though.

      • chortle_tortle@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I wasn’t accusing OP of anything

        I am. I didn’t read the title before popping into the post and only realized it after you posted it. I assumed it was generally about communication, but OP made the choice of not only gendering the conversation, but infantilizing the “strawgirl” in their head with it.

        It’s especially rich because if there a gender that struggles with communicating their needs and desires it’s overwhelmingly, empirically, men. Any projection of “mind reading” is likely because they lack the emotional intelligence to comprehend something that’s been told to them multiple times to the point of the partner going non-verbal when it happens again.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        OK. For the record I couldn’t tell whether you were actually talking about gendered language or something I was missing. I do also think when you purposefully say very little, inevitably people will make assumptions about what you “really meant” whether that’s justified or not. Which I appreciate is annoying.

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I wasn’t sure myself why the title was gendered the way it was in relation the image. I still haven’t figured out the connection there amongst all the accusations of misandry being thrown at me.

          Thanks.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            If I had to guess (lots of guessing) it’s like supposed to be a light-hearted expression like “big girl pants”

              • FishFace@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 hours ago

                All the times I have heard it said, which is not that many, yes. It was said in a light-hearted and, dare I say, kind way :)

                • velma@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  The times it’s been said to me have been condescending and meant to shame.

                  For the record, telling a grown woman to “use her big girl words” or put on her “big girl pants” is incredibly rude.

                  • FishFace@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    That sounds unpleasant.

                    I’ve mainly heard said by a person about herself, or from one woman to another, often as a way to make a joke of the sort that implied that they thought whatever task it was (that required the big girl pants) was big and difficult while acknowledging that it actually is not, e.g. “I put on my big girl pants and rang the council to tell them I need a new recycling bin”