• whereitsat@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    53 分钟前

    i’d rather go back to browsing the 1998 internet on a webTV box than this modern bullshit. no offense to anyone.

    the modern internet is a heavily propagandized mild abstraction of real life. the old internet was ‘the internet.’ it was a playground for nerds, misfits, shut-ins and the regular folk who made the mistake of logging on and trying to talk to the rest of us.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 小时前

    yeah it was cool back then. but like everything online, profit motives drive idiotic changes

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 小时前

    Yeah, enshittification.

    Same way when Apple advertised itself as first calling itself “the computer for the rest of us” and now? Besides becoming a fashion label of sorts, absurdly expensive and difficult-to-fix computers.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 小时前

    My mom told me never to click “I’m feeling lucky” because she thought it had something to do with porn because it’s a phrase people would say about sex.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 小时前

        My mom was weirdly prudish in the '90s and early '00s, I don’t really know why. Like she wouldn’t let me watch Dexter’s Lab because she thought it was gross or something? Idk. Weird time.

        • BetterDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 小时前

          Same here. She stormed into the room to make sure I wasn’t up to no good because she heard me say “hardcore” once.

          Her reasoning: “hardcore is a kind of porn” lol

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    12 小时前

    What is funny is that its not even better now compared to then. It used to be super fast and found everything on the web in an instant.

    And today, well, you know how Google search is…

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 小时前

      A former high-up at Google has stated that they intentionally made the search engine worse a few years ago so that people would see more ads and click on more sponsored links. Now, the best result is #15 in the list, on average.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 小时前

        ~~I don’t remember his name, but he got moved to the education department. ~~

        Someone else had the link.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 小时前

      “Here’s ads, misleading ai slop we generated from stolen content, and forty links to AI generated content that’s probably even worse. You might find something human on page 7 of the results. Oops it’s a dead link lmao.”

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 小时前

      Google once stated that their primary goal was to get you off of Google property as quickly as possible- IE deliver your search result and get you where you want to go. That was the exact opposite of every other major website at the time (search engines, ‘portals’, etc) which wanted to keep you in.

      It’s what made Google great. They were laser focused on the best search experience.

      Now their search kinda sucks, it’s all AI and fuzzy logic and whatnot and even with quotes and Verbatim it STILL doesn’t just search for what I typed in not what you thought I wanted

  • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    16 小时前

    It’s what happens when companies go public. The ideals of the company go out the door and they care about is profits

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    20 小时前

    become a monopoly by roleplaying as ethical and efficient

    fuck your userbase because they don’t have nearly as good alternatives

      • khánh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 小时前

        i’d argue that that playbook belongs to anthropic. everything about claude’s font and color scheme screams “ethical, productive, efficient, humanist” (we all know that’s far from the case)

  • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    24 小时前

    I mean, I get it, servers cost money, traffic costs money.

    But there’s a little gray zone between going broke and sucking out every cent possible. Isn’t making enough money enough?

    • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      23 小时前

      Shareholders need ever increasing value or they will sell their shares. In the US at least, it is illegal to not provide shareholders with value. The only way to reliably get value is to fuck over your customers at every turn and fire half of your employees every few years

      • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 小时前

        The old is new again with same bastards in suits. Just like the 19th century railroad craze which had some hedging their money but then lost the investment game.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          22 小时前

          Then you would still have private equity firms fucking everyone over, but with even less regulatory oversight.

          I think publicly traded companies should be nationalized under an independent and thoroughly-audited oversight body accountable to the taxpayers, and any profits generated should be distributed to fund public works, social services, welfare benefits, and civil sector orgs.

          And the idea of infinite growth needs to be abandoned entirely. These major internet companies need to be viewed as a public utility, and their goal should be to provide stable, reliable, quality services rather than churn an endless profit. This can only be done after nationalizing them though.

            • Photonic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 小时前

              The US can’t even ban elected officials from trading stocks. It has a president who openly brags about his own grift and nobody does a thing. I don’t think it’s going to happen soon…

    • tabris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 小时前

      In the word of Jim Stephanie Stirling, “They don’t just want a lot of money. They want all the money.”

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 小时前

      When you’re a Trillion Dollar company, you don’t need MORE money. You make enough to make everything run without additional income.

      But obviously a trillion dollars is still not enough. We need more.

  • Emi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 天前

    I remember before ai I would just find what I needed with the.first link. Now I need to scroll past 3 ad links. Even duckduckgo has sponsored links.

  • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    23 小时前

    Yeah, that’s how the internet worked out. Everything started out awesome to attract huge numbers of users, then slowly started collecting more and more of our data to use and sell while ramming in more and more ads.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 小时前

    Google (www.google.com) is a pure search engine - no weather, no news feed, no links to sponsors, no ads, no distractions, no portal litter. Nothing but a fast-loading search site. For now. Give it a decade.