You must log in or register to comment.
you found the one location where there’s a fat guy and four fit women.
too bad real life doesn’t have achievements like steam does.
that guy isnt particularly fat
Arm is obscuring how big the stomach is but there are signs.
Source: I can tell from some of the pixels and from having been quite fat in my time
That muffin top is pretty chunky. He must have a lot of money. Or this is staged/fake/bait.
deleted by creator
At least have the decency to take your sidepiece out to eat some place classy like Little Caesar’s.
All 4 women look hot yet he looks like a sack of potatoes. How. I’m used to hot guys acting like assholes and average guys being the better partner. This guy is a glitch in the matrix?
it’s rage bait for 14 year olds on tiktok and completely staged
Everyone in the picture is an actor. The joke on the sign is too well thought out for it to be a sudden ambush.
maybe my standards are skewed, dude has no cankles, no back boobs, no bingo wings and at least the remains of a haircut
cmon this is a Mcdicks, not a bistro on the Rue du Plat
All 4 women look
hotthin yet he looks like a sack of potatoes (fat).Fixed that for you. Hope that helps clear things up.
I was looking at their faces rly. I don’t judge hotness by how thin women are.
And you can’t see his face at all.
I see his clothes, his hair. He’s a sack of potatoes.
His over the shoulder fannypack.
With carabiner-attached labubu no less.
(I can’t tell for sure, but I hope.)
Yes you do. Thin people have more attractive faces.
what
Fat people have fluffy faces. Anorexic people have skull faces. Neither are attractive. Anything in between have normal faces. The faces I prefer are in that category. Not all women in the picture qualify as material I fall for, but they do have facial qualities many do like.
My partner has a little bit extra yet I drown inside when I see her face, I think she’s in the top when it comes to hotness. Not body wise, but I care about that less.
Show her your comments in this thread lmao
This is not true.
I mean, hotness is subjective. It’s fairly normal to find physically fit people attractive, and there’s nothing really inherently wrong about that. Plenty of people also find heavier set people attractive, and there’s nothing inherently wrong with that either.
deleted by creator
are they both eating happy meals?
Don’t look so happy to me.
If you order the Happy Meal cause you’re sad, is it still a Happy Meal?
A desperate attempt at happiness meal
A Hopeiness Meal
Gotta get them McSpookyBuckets
AI? The text on the sign looks off to me. I hate how I can’t just enjoy funny pictures anymore. Every fucking image needs to be scrutinized.
How about funny (to you) videos? Source ↓ https://www.tiktok.com/@brad_podray/video/7572224660868173086
Not AI, just fake the old fashioned way; it’s a staged “social experiment”
I was gonna say… they don’t look like a couple
Maybe not AI but certainly fake.
Yes we all know, it’s on the internet you see.
Maybe re-edited later but this pic predates genai that makes readable text by years if not decades. Maybe just different brands of letters scavenged for the lightbox
Nah, this is an older image
if you look closer, every letter is printed on it’s own piece of paper and glued separately
Monogamy hysterics strike again⚡
Cheating can happen in polyamorous relationships as well.
yes
being in a polycule, id consider it cheating if a partner hid another relationship from me
But in liberal sexual relationships that these Mcnogamist want exclusive rights to?
We comprehend intimacy “cheating.” These people want exclusive sexual obligations.the problem with “cheating” is the dishonesty NOT the social unacceptability
Then the sign would say:
I have zero issue with people expressing themselves sexually in relationships that aren’t non Monogamous, but eople should be in the loop on what kind of relationship you’re in with them.
I personally wouldn’t want to be in a non-monogamous relationship. Even when I was single I didn’t like dating multiple girls at the same time.
When I meet my wife I had been on a few dates with someone and had a date planned for the next day. The person I had been seeing called off our date morning of and that’s when I asked my coworker who introduced us to give her my number.
I’ve had FWBs but didn’t date others while we were hooking up. Was down to hangout and have sex with them but not build a romantic relationship but I was still monogamous with them and all I asked is they give me the choice of they start sleeping with someone else
you may want to comment this on the main post instead.
I am criticising monogamist is this thread, using laws to enforce their monogamy.
Making a lot of assumptions here.
The women standing in this picture could be in a polycule situation with the dude at the table and he could be stepping out on all of them with the seated woman. It could be a group of single women playing a mean-spirited prank on their friend’s lame first date. It could also be completely fake and made for attention.
I know there are a lot of monogamous people out there who talk shit about polyamory, largely out of ignorance or envy, but there’s no need to mirror that energy back at them. It won’t change their minds or stop the shit talk and it just increases the level of negativity surrounding the conversation. Remember, the sweetest revenge against your haters is to live your best life.
Wtf is that sus link?
Have you considered the third possibility that I mentioned? That it might be fake and for attention?
the sexual liberal partner
You’re aware that polyamorous relationships require clear communication and boundaries to not become abusive, correct? Just like monogamous ones do? From your word choice when talking about a potential cheater, I’m getting the impression that you don’t actually know what a healthy relationship is let alone what a healthy polyamorous relationship is.
…but judging by your other responses in this thread a productive conversation is not in the offing, so I’ll just end my part of it here and wish you a good day.
Making a lot of assumptions
I’m not. The worst part is, is making this a public spectacle. If it were a “step out” situation, why include the public & a private franchise to milk the situation? The reason we even have this picture is because these sexual domineers wanted to publicly shame the sexual liberal partner.
Remember, the sweetest revenge against your haters is to live your best life.
Then why shame a liberated partner in public, in a restaurant, for us to even have a captioned snapchat crop?
That link shows a chicken with pigtails?
Anyway… being poly isn’t a bad thing. Being poly and lying to a partner that your monogamous, kinda is. If one party of a relationship changes their mind after commitments are made, the other party should be made aware before anything is acted on. If not, they are a lying piece of shit that can’t be trusted. Pretending to be monogamous just to trick someone into a relationship until your bored with them, despicable.
Edit, lost my last word on posting.
That link shows a chicken with pigtails?
You need a tumblr account to see Kaijuno’s blog, which is the source of the snapchat crop.
We comprehend intimacy “cheating.”
Being poly and lying to a partner that your monogamous, kinda is
Let’s skip patronizing me about being dishonest in relationships. Did this sexual liberal lie to these mcnos? Yes. Does he deserve to be outed for dishonesty? Absolutely yes. Do these mcnos need to make this a public snapchat event? [insert your morality here]
Will they go to court to settle the divorce proceedings? Absolutely 200% yes.My issue is with western bigamy domineering that even allowed this snapchat to take place. Not that the dishonest partner got exposed for dishonesty. But that monogamist are leopards predating on law enforcement.
Mcnogamists strike again⚡
How much media that is put out is just because people engage with scandalous shit? If people didn’t, we might not have had to deal with reality shows or viral media apps. Of course there will be people using social media that want to be part of that. Sex and scandals sell.
I do think it’s odd that you think that me sharing my own views is patronizing you. I just gave my 2cents, from my personal experience, relating to cheating partners. Not all cheaters are poly, seen many cheaters choose a monogamous relationship later in life. They were just too cowardly to be open and honest with their partner(s) or worse (in my opinion), openly lied to a partner about their cheating. Some were poly, and it was a realization they were aiming for a relationship they didn’t really want, but had been raised by a society that said they did, and had tried to believe it. Does not excuse the cheating though.
My real only point is/was: Whatever your sexual preferences are, lying to an intimate partner about who you are intimate with is a shit move, and makes that liar shitty.
I don’t even know what you are trying to claim? You keep linking to a wiki article that just lists the status of legal polygamy in different countries and hoping people draw the same conclusions you have.
You also keep claiming that the man being accused of cheating is sexually liberal just because he has chosen to cheat, but I think that you would have to assume that he didn’t expect his partner to be A monogamist for him to be actually liberal about sex and not just an asshole.
Countries with legal Polygamy can still utilize social shaming and the law to sexually oppress their partners. In fact some of those states have some of the most severe punishments for infidelity on the planet, and they are typically hyper patriarchal and have laws only utilized against women.
You can’t be sexually liberal while still expecting your partner to practice monogamy.
Cheating isn’t about monogamy, it’s about lack of respect for the other part
Not in Mcnogamy. These are sexual domineers.
We both comprehend intimacy betrayal.
Heck, even dignity tarnish.
But sexual oppression, in the 21st‽There is nothing wrong in wanting sexual exclusivity, in the same way there is nothing wrong in wanting more than one partner.
Seeing either as “oppression” is limited mindset.I literally linked you law. <img src=“https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/6dedb145-206a-4b35-ab5e-c9e41e1130c7.png” alt=“Amerikkka” width=“24” height=“auto”> law. Law that is used to litigate the divorce industry. These people are sexual leopards. It’s morally wrong to apply sexual exclusivities in order to sexual oppress partners. You can believe sexual exclusivities and romance rn’t modern moral quandaries, but these are the leopards eating each others faces party, using law to justify their oppressions.
Be aware, as a black anarchist polyeros, I disavow these domineers. But stating facts as I observe them doesn’t mean I avow sexual oppressions.
As a polyero, would you start a relationship with someone that wants a monogamous relationship?
Yeah but it’s too much redpilled jargon to be understood by a simple mortal like me. So I’ll leave you to it since it’s starting to sound a lot like “anyone that doesn’t have my specific and niche point of view is an enemy and must be educated” and I don’t feel like being educated by someone that uses this amount of emoticons
“I linked you a paper please agree”
Lmao. You scream about liberation yet you’re the one wanting to control other people’s relationships.
Be aware, as a black anarchist polyeros, I 🌈disavow✨ these domineers
Reading comprehension maybe another thing Mcnogamists lack. Try rereading @ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.com, AdolfSchmitler, @athatet@lemmy.zip, & @azalea_flower@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Ayyo. Get my name outcha damn mouth.
Law that is used to litigate the divorce industry.
That’s a broken link, but am I correct in assuming that you are claiming the high rate of divorce in the US compared to countries that practice polygamy is due to some kind of expectation of monogamy and not due to something like the legality of no fault divorce?
I am claiming these sexual oppressors profit through litigations, not dishonesty & contract litigations. The spectacle is clearly captioned as “McCheating on my wife,” and not “McLying to my [sexually liberated] partner.” Let’s not deny there are profit incentives in these relationships.
Is it sexual oppression if both parties consented to the relationship being predicated on monogamy?
“McCheating on my wife,” and not “McLying to my [sexually liberated] partner.”
Again, I’m a bit confused on what your definition of sexually liberated really means.
Let’s not deny there are profit incentives in these relationships
I don’t think many relationships are started with profit incentive on their mind. Plus, no one in the US can force you to agree to a monogamist marriage if you didn’t first agree to it.
Are you claiming that in countries that have legal polygamy there is no sexual oppression?
Never.
That shaming culture is alive and well in 21c, and Monogamous domineers exist, still.Also, I’m not the one down voting your responses. I’m not trying to be overly critical, I think you have a unique perspective and I’m just trying to comprehend fully what you are trying to say.
Ah. Learn some anarchism.
I think that’s a bit patronizing, total sexual inclusivity is not a very large focus of anarchist literature as a whole.
In fact, Murray Bookchin is one of my favorite political writers.
I don’t think anyone was trying to claim shaming culture wasn’t still around. I’m not sure what all entails to your use of the term monogamous domineers.
Is the wife domineering over the husband by divorcing him? Wouldn’t that just allow him to be sexually liberated to sleep with whom he wants?
What is the alternative in this scenario? For the man to continue being sexually liberal and force his wife to either adopt his views or be in a relationship structure she does not consent too?
The wives, 3+, are using this spectacle to shame the dishonest man. How do you not see shaming culture is dominating both, the relationship, the public, and the legal system?
What is the alternative in this scenario?
I gave 4 examples already, on how to liberally praxis liberal sexual autonomy, and still deal with a dishonest individual. I am not sure how I can make it more boomer literate for you. May I also suggest you research modern day sexual liberation research on your own?
wives, 3+, are using this spectacle to shame the dishonest man. How do you not see shaming culture is dominating both, the relationship, the public, and the legal system?
Again, I never made the argument that shame culture wasn’t widely prevalent, influential, or good.
I gave 4 examples already, on how to liberally praxis liberal sexual autonomy, and still deal with a dishonest individual. I am not sure how I can make it more boomer literate for you. May I also suggest you research modern day sexual liberation research on your own?
This comment was made before you specified your criticism was about the concept and not aimed solely a particular individual in this example.
Mcnogamy.
