• qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      Thank you! I have ad block for PC but am forced to use mobile for awhile and was dreading the incessant ads on mobile.

      I guess it’s not too great of a coincidence though; YouTube is always making the platform worse, so these recommendations are flying around pretty often.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Keep paying guys, someones gotta do it. Thank you for your service. Keeps YouTube available for the rest of us who will never, ever pay a greedy, evil fucking company like Google.

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I used to pay for this. Started a long time ago, when YouTube’s content was… well, better. But now they’re pushing EVERYTHING towards “Shorts” and it’s pure garbage. Not only does it NOT curate for the people watching it, like how many times do I have to say “not intereste”, “don’t show me this channel anymore,” or just fucking report channels for their “algorithm” to get a clue. AI being spammed left and right, and they claim they can’t do shit about it, meanwhile, you whistle 3 seconds of a Nintendo song and your channel already has a strike against it.

    The amount of content farms that’s just pulling crap from reddit, putting dumb pointless videos behind it, while AI reads a made-up story. The amount of content where it’s just some fucker who’s just staring at the screen like a creepy fucker, meanwhile something from the MCU plays in the background… they’re adding nothing. Or the pre-recorded “masked” heads (like Spider-Man, Iron Man, etc.) randomly gesturing at… fuck all.

    People used to make things. YouTube had content. Not saying it was all great. Since TikTok got big, I feel like YT chasing after them things started to go downhill. And then “AI” comes out and the quality just fucking tanks.

    I don’t pay for YT Premium anymore. PiHole + AdBlock is used everywhere now. And if a YouTuber promotes anything, literally, fuck that product/company as well. Fucking scorch earth on all those fucking advertisers and the algorithm.

  • giant_smeeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I sometimes feel bad for bypassing all this, then I see the in video sponsors they all have. So now I run Sponsorblock…

      • Mistic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        And they don’t pay for you skipping them, which is a win for advertisers, but a loss for Google.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I assume smeeg was talking about inline sponsors not associated with google who don’t get metrics if what you saw/skipped

  • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Smarttubenext on nvidia shield

    Revanced youtube on android phones

    Ublockorigin on browsers

    No more ads.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’ve never had revanced last more than a week. Bad luck i suspect. Newpipe->greyjay->brave

      Three seperate active dev teams fighting off the bastards.

      I don’t want to use brave, but it’s never been down for me, so it’s weapon of last resort.

      I am a bit worried that, with Google’s upcoming changes, they’ll be a walled garden within a year.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I Just run YouTube via my browser with adblock instead of trying to fiddle with an app. And i have another extension so videos doesn’t stop playing when i turn off my screen.

    • jayrar@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Also grayjay, new pipe on android

      vacuum tube for smart TV.

      There is so many project to just get rid of YouTube’s ads

  • Toasticus@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    17 hours ago

    "YouTube said the hike will “allow us to continue to improve Premium and support the creators and artists you watch on YouTube.”

    Bullshit, bullshit and more bullshit. They say that every single time they raise the prices. It’s the same dogshit excuse.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They allegedly give 55% to he creators and pocket the rest… And this is AFTER paying creators fractions of a cent per view and shoving expensive ads down the huge majority of their visitors throats.

      They are a massively shitty company. The amount of money they steal from content creators is WILD.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        content creators mostly cant live off it, they have promotions and brand deals that is seperate from youtube. also patreon accounts, or thier own website.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      well, doubling the minimum watches to pay people blocking ad blockers harder and halfing the rates at which they’re getting paid does fit the text they gave

    • BromSwolligans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah what a fucking joke. The one and only feature they’re selling (especially since they bailed on original content like 2 years after they started) is ad-free viewing. You need a price hike every 18 months to ensure the “don’t show this guy ads” line in my profile config stays set to True? Fuck off.

      • HereIAm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Honestly, the biggest selling point for me, and pretty much the entire reason I do have premium, is that they pay the creators you watch way more than a regular view. I guess the alternative would be to sign up to their patreons for a dollar.

        • Zarobi@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          According to this page:

          Creators earn money from these subscriptions through a dedicated pool of revenue for each subscription type: 30% of the net subscription revenue for Premium and 60% for Premium Lite. This allocation factors in the costs of operating and promoting the service, including amounts we pay to music partners. This pool is distributed to creators based on member watch time and views, and from that distribution creators receive revenue share: 55% for long-form videos and 45% for Shorts.

          TLDR: YouTube premium pays out to each content creator about A$0.23 per month. Regular ad watching gives A$0.09 per month.

          Tap for math

          Current price of premium is A$16.99 a month in Australia. 30% of $16.99 totals $5.10 monthly pool distributed across every content creator you watch. 70% or $11.90 of your monthly fee goes straight to YouTube and royalties to maintain their music platform you may or may not use.

          The math gets really speculative here, but let’s say you watch 20 different content creators, half of them make long form videos like Reject Convenience, half of them make shorts. You watch an even mix of 10 minute videos and shorts. Each long form content creator will receive ($5.10 • 0.55) / 10 = $0.28. Each shorts creator will receive ($5.10 • 0.45) / 10 = $0.23. Per month. It’s a pittance really.

          In comparison, an ad view gives about $0.03 per view, which if you watched 3 videos from each creator, would total $0.09. So premium gives more, but it’s like 14¢ per month more per person.

          I can’t be bothered converting all these numbers to USD, sorry. You can roughly calculate it for your own situation using this formula:

          C = (P • 0.3 • F) / N

          Where

          • C is Content Creator Payout (each)
          • P is price of YouTube premium for you
          • F is form of content. 0.55 for long form, 0.45 for shorts
          • N is how many content creators in the same group of F you watch per month
  • breakpointx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Well i still pay for it for two reasons- no ads and music. I use YouTube music as the music service since it has more artista from my country as for example spotify. And ads free since I and my family love watching each specific videos and are subscribed to different creators. I could switch to Spotify for music but then getting all devices, mostly our tv with chrome cast a solid app that somehow blocks ads without any issues… I would do that. And what about the iOS devices? I don’t want alternative stores on my iOS infected devices just to get an alternative app running. Then again, I don’t want to have pihole being my single point of failure on the complete home network. But the pi hole thing is completely different story (and out if scope).

    • Toasticus@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I think PeerTube should be for hobby purposes. I mean, here’s where I am coming from. I am from a period of the internet, where you were not meant to be e-famous. I still at times, believe this. Look at what happened when the idea of the tiniest bit of fame and success people allow to get to their heads when they realize that they can just make videos and profit off of them.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I wish PeerTube worked. For a while I tried just leaving in running on the theory that it might help out, but it didn’t seem to do anything. Not sure if I’m doing it wrong?

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m running a private, unfederated node; it works. I watch TILVIDS whenever I can find something on there.

        This is not an “if you build it, they will come” scenario,

        There’s no monetization, so there are almost no content creators.

        Creators generally don’t do it for free.

        Good creators rely on income from the videos to produce higher-quality videos

        Youtube: surfaces creators’ videos pays creators hosts the videos handles CDN

        Peertube: The creator pays to host the video (largely against their ISP’s wishes) There’s no surfacing There’s no payments If you’re lucky peertube doesn’t need CDN.

        Even if they go all patreon, they’re still not getting that extra cash, surfacing, and free hosting that youtube does.

        We need some kind of FOSS Patreon and to have Peertube do some kind of partner/recommendation engine.

        • ten8tp@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          I’m not shilling for LMG, but something like Floatplane would make sense. You pay per creator for their extra content and ad free viewing and the cut goes in favor to the creator. Of course Floatplane has to also make money. They’re not in it to serve you ads or use your data to make money. If that took off I could easily see people paying 3-5 creators monthly to watch their videos ad free with extras on one platform.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Nebula has more and is cheaper. I had some interest in Floatplane. Last time I looked at it, Youtube was cheaper for my use case and them not listing creators up front is bad news.

      • happydoors@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Same, dude. The power users will assume everyone has the time to assemble/learn the skill of setting it up. That being said, it’s on my list of things to figure out one day!

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          yeah, one of the responses lower down made me realize why PeerTube is unlikely to be a success any time soon - it’s not something the typical YouTube user has to deal with.

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I wanted it to not be dog slow, because every one I tried spent all its time buffering. I’m not really sure how the architecture of it works but it seemed to suggest some kind of p2p thing so thought that leaving the window open might seed it? But either it didn’t or just nobody was interested.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            you are not seeding by just leaving the window open on any peertube page. you are only seeding the specific video you have opened, if you have opened one, and probably not the complete video just the last segments you still have cached. this p2p sharing is mostly for when a certain video gets popular, to help with peek load, and for live streams. if the video was buffering for a long time it’s probably because the server did not have enough upload bandwidth, and no other viewer had the video segments.

            there is another load balancing system that peertube supports, they can clone videos fromneach other and help serving them: https://docs.joinpeertube.org/admin/following-instances#platforms-redundancy

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            It never buffers for me, but I do have a full gig and super low latency

    • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Even though it’s no longer tractable for the casual hobbyist (me) to run a node, Invidious is still usable thanks to absolutely heroic effort by the ~4 organizations still willing and able to invest the crazy infrastructure needed to prevent GOOG from blocking them.

      https://docs.invidious.io/instances/

    • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      You can’t really monetize PeerTube though, so you’re never going to get full time creators there. Media distribution has always been a choke point. Always will be. Short of a non-profit foundation and a unionized creators guild joining forces to operate a decentralized subscription video platform, you’re never going to have a real alternative. I mean… there’s Nebula which is basically that, but who goes to Nebula, it’s full of lefties and educators and theatre people.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          You can monetize PT with Patreon, but you can monetize YT with Patreon and get paid twice.

          That’s why YT has 5 9’s of the creators.

        • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Sure, but then you’re still bringing a for-profit company into the mix. PeerTube is your loss-leader and Patreon is your main platform.

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          I’m with GreenBard on this and was always saying that monetization is the biggest peertube problem. Patreon and such are not an ideal option, subscription is IMO. A subscription that would be distributed through authors fairly, but that’s not an easy task I suppose.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      So they, too, can enshittify your whole experience? Or are they somehow immune from capitalism??

      Ah, it’s federated. Makes sense.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        a certain instance can, but that won’t affect the network as a whole that much. you hop over to another instance and done. the developers also could, but it’s open source, it can be forked by dedicated server operators. It’s also developed by a nonprofit, so there’s not abig risk, and thry have a good track record.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It’s a federated network of open source servers, anybody can host it. So, I think we are pretty safe. For now.

  • BromSwolligans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Paid for Premium for ten years. Then, moved to a family plan since my brother offered and my wife had moved in with me; it saved me a little money and got her Premium. Then they did the thing they’re all doing where they said “you don’t live in the same house so you’re not a family” and I said, “there’s no way in fucking hell this household is paying $25+ for fucking YouTube, a thing we watch too much of anyway because it’s algorithmically mind-fucking us everyday,” and then we just let it lapse. We’ve got SmarTube on the Android TV for the occasional ad-free video, and it’s clunky enough that we don’t get sucked in, and I’ve got uBlockOrigin on my browser because obviously, and they’ve gone from getting some money out of me to never getting a penny again.

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      And the fucked up thing is that’s not across the board, for example I’ve been using family premium since it basically came out and my users are located all over the place. Two of which have never even been to my place, and live 4-6 hours away.

      It’s shitty, because I wish everyone could have the experience I have had with it.

  • rynn@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    20 hours ago

    As much as I hate this, yt premium is probably one of my most used services of anything streaming. I suck at lot of bytes down from them so I guess at least I might be getting what I pay for?

    • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      getting what I pay for

      GOOG and all its affiliated advertisers – essentially, every corporation on this planet – now knows not only all your browsing and watching habits, but also that you are a likely good return on investment for more mining, more fine-grained targeting, more scrutiny.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Sure but it’s the opportunism and greed that grates. They pay literally zero for the overwhelming majority of their content, and very little for the rest.

      If you Writer-Produce-Star in a TV show that gets 2 million viewers on NBC or ABC, you’re well into the five figures per episode in individual take-home pay, maybe even six. YouTube on the other hand you might just about hit $10,000 for 2M views depending on niche, but they cover zero of your expenses and take none of the up-front risk. If you’ve got more than one person working on making that show, or you had any expenses attached to it, you’re pretty much screwed.

      Google could VERY easily keep turning a profit on the old price, but shareholders demand infinite unending growth.

      • rynn@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Hey I didn’t say I like this, just trying to pull a lemon out of the lemonade but it’s more like a mud ball out of a swamp.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      The trick is to use family plan. I and bunch of friends made one, each pays around 4€.

      EDIT: Just make sure you actually live in the same city.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I attempted this because it is a good deal, but unfortunately the rest of my household didn’t care that they got ads, and my mom was too much of a penny-pincher to get anyone in her household to want to do it.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        This is my setup, and we are spread across 4 houses in 2 states. Never been an issue.

        • Pika@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Nor will it, to be honest. I don’t see Google shooting themselves in the foot like that.

          Netflix did something similar with the password crackdown a few years ago and while it worked out in their favor, I don’t foresee YouTube having the same results. YouTube isn’t really providing much of a service aside from removing ads, so chances are if they crack down on that, it’s not going to equate to people in other households buying a membership to continue it. It’s just going to be less income/revenue. YouTube would need to bet on at least two of the people running family plans are going to convert over to a YouTube premium account. Which I don’t think is a safe bet for the prime canadates that went out of their way to set up the family plan, because if they were going to do that they would have done it in the first plac

          • BassTurd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            For sure. I’ve already contemplated switching to a different streaming service for music, but while I have YT premium I’ll keep using YT music, although they keep making that interface worse and worse. My YT consumption will just plummet to only a couple of channels, and I’ll just work through my backlog of the terabytes of media I have on my Plex server. Hell, might even go outside and see what that’s all about, but I don’t want to rush into anything.