• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Thanks, that certainly explains the first half of the post, but what’s going on in the second half? Are there lots of people blaming the husband?

        • Noklito@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          22 hours ago

          There is a tiktok movement that believes that despite all evidence and witness statements, phone logs, and surveillance footage that somehow the husband is responsible.

          This is supported by vibes, astrology and folk magic, it’s very strange. The court case isn’t even about who’s responsible for the murder, it’s about if the Defense has a valid insanity plea to keep her from jail or getting institutionalized.

          • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            Thanks for the context. Sounds dumb as hell … wonder how much of that is manufactured by rightwingers.

            valid insanity plea to keep her from jail or getting institutionalized.

            A successful insanity plea keeps you from getting institutionalized?

            • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              It’s not dumb it’s real.

              I dated a lawyer who believed in astrology and folk magic. A lot of people believe in this shit because they are sad people and it gives meaning and magic to their life… basically Disney adult type shit.

            • Noklito@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              It’s a weird situation, most insanity pleas are fought with the defense having to prove they were mentally unwell and incapable of being willingly responsible for their actions but because of the lead up to the crime, it’s being handled in reverse.

              She killed those kids but doesn’t want to go to jail and pleads not guilty by insanity so she wants to be institutionalized. The plaintiff argues she wasn’t insane and was in control of her actions due to how functional she was till the last minute before the crime would have been possible as she orchestrated the conditions to allow her to commit the murders. It’s an interesting case that’s getting muddled by the publics personnel beliefs and is also being co-opted for political purposes by right-wingers as proof the 19th amendment was a mistake.

              It’s insane to see how we even got to this point but it’s being compared to the OJ murders for a reason.

              • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                19 hours ago

                it’s also a proxy for class/gender war. she’s a rich white woman, do you think if she was any other demographic she’d be able to get away with this, let alone have other white women fan girling super hard for her?

                some folks legit seem to think no rich person should ever be held accountable for their crimes, especially if they are female.

                plus the entire thing is insane and heinous and evokes intense emotions in pretty much everyone who hears about it.

                tbh 9/10 cases in the Witcher III are just people trying to hide domestic murder behind folklore shit.

                • Noklito@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Unrelated, your name made me chuckle, thanks for the smile.

                  To the point, I’ve noticed that too, it’s so overwhelmingly obvious that none of the support she’s getting is authentic, it’s clear people are using this for their or culture war nonsense and it’s concerning as the precedent this case could set can have some serious consequences.

                  It feels like a lot of people aren’t taking this seriously, the arguments/discussions people are trying to make around this can snowball into something disastrous.

                  • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    17 hours ago

                    My wife started getting into it from Instagram crap and was talking about how it’s possible if not likely the husband actually did it.

                    I took 5 minutes to find she’s not even saying she didn’t do it and that still doesn’t matter to her.

                    I do not fucking get it, and was accused of being misogynistic for not thinking it was possible the husband did it.

                    I can’t even with social media

            • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Sure, if you can make the case that you were not in your right mind when you committed a crime and therefore unable to grasp what you were doing (criminal responsibility or Schuldunfähigkeit in German), you cannot be punished. If the court also finds that you were only temporarily in a condition that made you commit the crime but will most likely not do anything like it again and are not a danger to others? You may go neither to prison nor to a mental institution.

              • Noklito@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                That’s a very interesting way of handling the situation. Honestly think that a more appropriate way of handling/framing the case.